| 1 |
Which analytical conclusion can be drawn about the success of inclusionary zoning (IZ) programs across cities?
|
Market context and institutional capacity jointly determine policy outcomes. |
|
I choose this answer because the article says the success of inclusionary zoning does not depend on only one thing. It depends on both the housing market situation and the strength of local institutions.
And if a city has a strong housing market, developers may be able to provide affordable units more easily. But the city also needs strong institutions, such as good monitoring systems, clear rules, and administrative staff. If the market is good but the government cannot enforce the policy, the program may fail. If the government is strong but the market is weak, developers may build fewer projects. |
This answer is supported by institutional theory and the article’s integrated framework. Institutional theory means that policies work differently depending on local rules, organizations, and government capacity. So, even if two cities use similar IZ policies, the results can be different because their institutions and markets are different.
Location in the article:
On page 2, section 2.1, paragraph 2, the article explains that local market conditions and institutional capacity influence program outcomes, so IZ policies must be carefully adjusted to local contexts.
On page 3, section 2.2, paragraphs 3–4, the article explains that institutional theory helps show why similar housing policies can produce different outcomes in different places. The framework also shows that policy design is mediated by implementation factors, including institutional capacity, market context, and local policy environment.
On page 7–8, section 4.4, Market context influence, the article reports that stronger markets are linked with more positive social sustainability outcomes. However, successful programs also need developer incentives, compliance monitoring, administrative oversight, and community engagement. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 2 |
What analytical trade-off must policymakers balance when enforcing IZ?
|
Maximizing developer profits vs. maintaining affordability. |
|
Because IZ policies require developers to include affordable housing units in new housing projects. This creates a trade-off between two goals.
One goal is to keep housing affordable for low- and moderate-income people. Another goal is to make sure developers still have enough profit and motivation to build new housing. If IZ rules are too strict, developers may feel the project is not worth building. But if rules are too weak, the city may not get enough affordable housing.
So, policymakers must balance developer feasibility and housing affordability. |
Research in the paper that supports this answer:
On page 9, section 5.5, the paper cites research showing that strong housing markets can support higher affordability requirements, but weak markets may face lower development activity when requirements are too high. This supports the trade-off between developer profit and affordability.
Final answer sentence for the box:
The answer is Maximizing Developer Profits Vs. Maintaining Affordability because IZ policies must balance developers’ financial feasibility with the social goal of providing affordable housing. The article shows that successful IZ needs market-sensitive rules, so cities can protect affordability without stopping new housing development. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 3 |
How can inclusionary zoning policies enhance economic mobility in cities?
|
By integrating affordable units into high-opportunity neighborhoods. |
|
I choose this answer because the article explains that IZ can improve economic mobility when low- and moderate-income families can live in areas with better opportunities.
In simple words, if affordable housing is placed in good neighborhoods, residents may get better access to good schools, jobs, transportation, public services, and social networks. These things can help families improve their future income and quality of life. |
This answer is supported by spatial justice theory. This theory means that people should have fair access to good places in the city, not only rich people. The article uses this theory to explain why the location of affordable housing is important.
Location in the article:
On page 1, Introduction, paragraph 2, the article says IZ creates mixed-income communities and gives lower-income households access to high-opportunity neighborhoods. This directly supports the answer.
On page 3, section 2.2, paragraph 2, the article explains that spatial justice theory shows why placing affordable housing in high-opportunity areas is important for social sustainability.
The research evidence is also shown on page 3, section 2.3, paragraphs 1 and 3. The article reports that children living in mixed-income or high-opportunity neighborhoods show better educational and economic mobility outcomes. It also says access to high-opportunity neighborhoods can improve employment and educational outcomes.
On page 7, section 4.2, the article also explains that IZ policies can support economic mobility through better educational attainment, employment stability, income progression, and career advancement. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 4 |
If administrative monitoring is weak, what likely happens to social sustainability outcomes?
|
They stagnate or decline because compliance is not enforced. |
|
I choose this answer because administrative monitoring is very important for IZ policy success.
if the government does not check the program well, developers may not follow the rules properly. Affordable units may not stay affordable for a long time, and the policy may not really help low- and moderate-income people. So, social sustainability outcomes, such as social integration, housing stability, and access to opportunity, may stop improving or become weaker. |
This answer is supported by institutional theory. Institutional theory means that policies need strong rules, good organizations, and effective monitoring systems to work in real life. A policy may look good on paper, but if nobody checks compliance, the result may fail.
Location in the article:
On page 3, section 2.2, paragraph 3, the article explains that institutional theory helps show why similar policies can create different outcomes in different places. This is because formal rules and informal systems affect how housing policies work in practice.
On page 3, section 2.2, paragraph 5, the article explains that the IZ framework includes institutional capacity, especially administrative resources and monitoring systems. This means monitoring is a key link between policy design and social sustainability outcomes.
On page 8, Table 8, the article shows that successful IZ programs often include compliance monitoring and administrative oversight. Compliance monitoring appears in 82% of successful implementations, and administrative oversight appears in 76%.
On page 9, section 5.4, paragraphs 1–3, the article says that jurisdictions with strong administrative infrastructure achieve better social sustainability outcomes. It also cites research showing that programs with dedicated monitoring staff have higher compliance rates and better long-term affordability preservation |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 5 |
How does the “feedback loop” in Fig. 1 (ARTICLE 1: Inclusionary Zoning as a Tool for Social Sustainability) contribute to long-term housing policy improvement?
|
It allows policymakers to adjust based on measured social outcomes. |
|
I choose this choice because the feedback loop in Fig. 1 means policymakers should look at the results of IZ policies and use that information to improve the policy later.
IZ policy should not be fixed forever. If the results show that social integration, affordability, or community stability is weak, policymakers can change the rules, improve monitoring, adjust set-aside percentages, or add better support systems. This helps the policy become stronger over time. |
This answer is supported by the article’s integrated framework and institutional theory. Institutional theory means that policies work better when organizations have good rules, monitoring systems, and the ability to improve implementation. The feedback loop is important because it helps policymakers learn from outcomes and refine the policy.
Location in the article:
On page 2, Fig. 1, the diagram shows a feedback loop from social sustainability outcomes back to policy design. The figure explains that outcome assessment informs policy refinement. This directly supports the answer.
On page 3, section 2.2, paragraph 5, the article explains that the framework links policy design, institutional capacity, market context, and social outcomes. It also says the feedback loop shows how outcome assessment supports continuous policy refinement.
On page 10, section 5.13, paragraph 1, the article says successful IZ programs need regular evaluation and adjustment. Programs with formal evaluation cycles and adjustment mechanisms were more likely to maintain housing production across market cycles. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 6 |
Which dimension links social sustainability and urban economics most directly?
|
Income targeting |
|
I choose this choice because this choice connects social sustainability and urban economics most directly.
Social sustainability is about fairness, equal access, and helping different income groups live in the city. Urban economics is about housing prices, income levels, market demand, and affordability. Income targeting connects both sides because it decides which income groups should receive affordable housing support.
For example, IZ policies may target low- and moderate-income households so they can live in areas that normally may be too expensive. This helps reduce inequality and supports economic mobility. Other choices, like compliance method or developer profit margin, are important, but they do not connect social fairness and economic affordability as directly as income targeting. |
This answer is supported by social sustainability theory and urban economics logic. Social sustainability focuses on equity, social integration, and access to opportunities. Urban economics focuses on affordability, income, housing demand, and market conditions. Income targeting links these ideas because it uses income levels to decide who should benefit from IZ housing.
Location in the article:
On page 1, Introduction, paragraph 1, the article explains that IZ addresses housing affordability by requiring or encouraging affordable housing units inside market-rate developments. This shows the economic side of the policy.
On page 1, Introduction, paragraph 2, the article says social sustainability includes equity, social cohesion, community stability, and access to opportunities. It also explains that IZ helps lower-income households access high-opportunity neighborhoods. This supports the social side of income targeting.
On page 5, Results section, paragraph about Fig. 4, the article lists income targeting as one of the key policy features and says it is evaluated against social sustainability outcomes, including employment metrics and income progression.
On page 5, Results section, paragraph explaining the matrix, the article states that income targeting policies show a strong correlation with economic mobility metrics. This means income targeting helps connect affordable housing policy with economic improvemen |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 7 |
Why might voluntary IZ programs yield weaker results than mandatory ones?
|
They rely on uncertain developer participation. |
|
I choose this because voluntary IZ programs depend on whether developers choose to join or not. If developers do not want to participate, the city may get fewer affordable housing units.
And mandatory IZ is like a clear rule: developers must include affordable units. But voluntary IZ is more like an invitation: developers may join only if they think it is useful for them. Because of this, voluntary programs can produce weaker and less predictable results. |
My answer is supported by institutional theory. This theory says that strong rules, clear enforcement, and good institutions affect how well a policy works. If the program is only voluntary, the rules may be weaker, so outcomes depend too much on developers’ willingness.
Location in the article:
On page 1, Introduction, paragraph 1, the article explains that IZ works by requiring or incentivizing affordable housing units in market-rate developments. The word “requiring” connects to mandatory programs, while “incentivizing” connects to voluntary or incentive-based programs.
On page 3, section 2.2, paragraph 3, the article explains that institutional theory shows how formal rules and informal norms shape how housing policies work in practice. This supports the idea that weaker rules can lead to weaker results.
On page 9, section 5.4, paragraph 3, the article cites research showing that jurisdictions with mandatory inclusionary zoning and strong administrative oversight achieved higher compliance rates than those relying on voluntary programs. This directly supports why voluntary IZ may be weaker. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 8 |
Which reform could best strengthen social outcomes without deterring developers?
|
Provide density bonuses or tax incentives tied to affordability targets. |
|
I chhose this choice because this reform can support both sides: it helps cities get more affordable housing, and it also gives developers a reason to keep building.
And if the government only forces developers to provide affordable units, developers may feel the profit is too low. But if the government gives benefits like density bonuses allowing developers to build more units or tax incentives, developers can still make the project financially possible. At the same time, the city can still reach its affordability goals. |
This answer is supported by the idea of policy calibration. Policy calibration means IZ rules must be adjusted to fit local market conditions. A good IZ policy should not be too strict or too weak. It should balance developer feasibility with affordable housing goals.
Location in the article:
On page 2, section 2.1, paragraph 2, the article says local market conditions and institutional capacity influence IZ outcomes. It also explains that policies must be carefully calibrated to local contexts.
On page 5, Results section, paragraph explaining Fig. 4, the article lists developer incentives as an important policy feature and says developer incentives show moderate to strong correlation across social sustainability outcomes. This supports the idea that incentives can improve social outcomes while keeping developers involved.
On page 8, Table 8, the article shows that developer incentives appear in 88% of successful implementations, which is the highest among the listed implementation factors. This means incentives are strongly connected with successful IZ outcomes.
On page 9, section 5.5, the article explains that strong markets can support higher affordability requirements, while weak markets may lose development activity if requirements are too high. This supports using incentives and flexible rules so developers are not discouraged. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 9 |
Why is inclusionary zoning considered both a policy tool and a moral imperative?
|
Because it promotes equitable access to urban opportunities. |
|
I choose this choice because inclusionary zoning is not only a technical housing policy. It also has a moral purpose: helping low- and moderate-income people get fair access to good places in the city.
IZ tries to make cities fairer. It allows people with lower income to live closer to good schools, jobs, transportation, hospitals, and safer neighborhoods. This is why it is both a policy tool and a moral imperative. It is a policy tool because it uses housing rules, and it is moral because it supports fairness and reduces inequality. |
This answer is supported by social sustainability theory and spatial justice theory. Social sustainability theory focuses on equity, social cohesion, community stability, and access to opportunities. Spatial justice theory says that good urban spaces should not be available only to rich people; low-income families should also have access to high-opportunity areas.
Location in the article:
On page 1, Introduction, paragraph 1, the article says IZ addresses housing affordability by requiring or encouraging affordable housing units inside market-rate developments. This shows IZ as a policy tool.
On page 1, Introduction, paragraph 2, the article explains that social sustainability includes equity, social cohesion, community stability, and long-term social viability. It also says IZ creates mixed-income communities and gives lower-income households access to high-opportunity neighborhoods. This directly supports the moral idea of fair opportunity.
On page 3, section 2.2, paragraph 2, the article uses spatial justice theory to explain that housing location matters because city spaces can reflect and reinforce inequality. The article states that placing affordable housing in high-opportunity areas is important for social sustainability.
Research evidence in the paper also supports this answer. On page 3, section 2.3, paragraph 1, the article says longitudinal studies found better educational and economic mobility outcomes for children growing up in mixed-income developments. On page 7, section 4.2, the article reports positive effects on educational attainment, employment stability, income progression, and career advancement. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 10 |
Why is early intervention crucial for students with JNCL?
|
It maximizes learning during early cognitive stability. |
|
I choose It Maximizes Learning During Early Cognitive Stability because the article explains that children with JNCL have a period when they can still learn before their thinking, memory, speech, and other abilities decline more seriously. This early period is like a “learning window.” If teachers and caregivers start intervention early, children can learn important skills before learning new things becomes harder.
Early intervention does not cure dementia, prevent all physical symptoms, delay special education completely, or guarantee full language recovery. It mainly helps children use the time when their brain is still more stable to learn useful skills for the futur |
This answer is supported by the principle of early intervention and proactive learning. On page 2, section 2, the article explains that education should use the “window of opportunity for learning” before significant cognitive decline. The Abstract on page 1 also states that proactive and hastened learning should focus on adaptive skills needed later. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 11 |
Which structural issue most limits equitable education for JNCL students?
|
Inadequate awareness and institutional capacity. |
|
I choose Inadequate Awareness And Institutional Capacitybecause the article explains that many teachers and school professionals did not have enough knowledge, information, and resources to support students with JNCL properly. Since JNCL is a progressive disease, students’ needs change over time. If schools and institutions do not understand the disease well, they may not be able to plan fair and suitable education for every student.
The other choices are not correct because the article does not say the main problem is too much technology, low teacher turnover, too much parent involvement, or cultural rejection of inclusive education. |
The main principle is equitable education needs institutional support. Students with JNCL need special educational planning because they have vision loss, cognitive decline, communication problems, and motor decline. For education to be fair, schools must have enough knowledge, resources, trained staff, and support systems.
In page 3, section 3.3.2 “Educational service provision,” paragraph 1, the paper says that professionals had difficulty defining educational goals, completing educational plans, and implementing appropriate interventions because the disease was unpredictable. The same paragraph also states that personnel lacked adequate resources and information to build local competence for supporting affected students.
In page 8, Conclusion, paragraph 2, the article says school personnel may not be adequately equipped to anticipate and respond to students’ needs because they lack knowledge about the disease, its progression, and how to meet the challenges caused by it. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 12 |
What does the data trend in Fig. 3 imply for curriculum planning?
|
Learning should increasingly focus on comprehension and adaptive communication. |
|
I choose “Learning Should Increasingly Focus On Comprehension And Adaptive Communication” because Fig. 3 shows that as children with JNCL get older, their expressive language or speaking ability becomes weaker, but their comprehension or understanding is often still stronger than their ability to speak.
This means teachers should not think that a student does not understand just because they cannot speak clearly. Curriculum planning should support the student’s remaining comprehension and add adaptive communication methods, such as gestures, signs, AAC, or other communication tools. |
The main principle is curriculum planning based on communication decline and retained comprehension. In JNCL, language development does not decline equally in every part. The article shows that expression declines more clearly than comprehension, so education should be adjusted to help students communicate in ways that match their changing abilities.
In page 4, Figure 3, the chart shows the relationship between comprehension and oral expression at different ages. The trend shows that older students are more often rated as having comprehension better than expression.
In page 4, section 3.3.3 “Communication and language,” paragraph 1, the article explains that in early school years, receptive and expressive language are often similar, but as age increases, expressive language declines, while parents believe comprehension is retained better than oral expression.
Also, in page 4, section 3.3.3, paragraph 4, the paper discusses Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) as a way to support communication when oral speech becomes weaker. This supports the idea that curriculum should include adaptive communication. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 13 |
Why is the Educational Development Observation (EDO) tool significant?
|
It provides individualized data for adaptive educational planning. |
|
I choose this choice because the EDO tool was created to help teachers, parents, and professionals understand each JNCL student as an individual. It does not just give a general rule for all students, but helps observe the student’s strengths, needs, current abilities, and areas that need support.
This is important because JNCL is a progressive disease. The student’s vision, speech, memory, movement, and independence can change over time. So, schools need updated information to adjust the learning plan and support the student properly. |
The main principle is individualized and adaptive educational planning. Students with JNCL have different symptoms and disease progression, so education should be planned based on each student’s real condition, not a one-size-fits-all method.
In page 2, paragraph 1, the article states that one key outcome of the JNCL and Education Project was the development of a new educational assessment tool called Educational Development Observation (EDO).
In page 6, section 3.4 “Educational development observation (EDO) tool,” paragraph 1, the paper explains that the EDO tool was developed to assess the educational, social, and community support needs and strengths of children and young persons with JNCL. It includes 11 core areas such as vision, communication, literacy, social life, motor function, behavior and mood, attention and memory, independence, interests, and equipment.
In page 7, paragraph 1, the article says EDO should be completed by a multidisciplinary team and can be reviewed periodically as the child’s needs change. This shows that EDO supports adaptive educational planning over time. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 14 |
How does the concept of “hastened learning” align with sustainable education principles?
|
It prioritizes long-term adaptability and independence. |
|
I choose this chice because hastened learning means teaching important skills early, before children with JNCL lose more cognitive, visual, speech, or motor abilities. The goal is not just to learn for today, but to prepare them for future stages of the disease.
This connects with sustainable education because sustainable education should help learners live and adapt in the long term. For JNCL students, this means learning skills such as daily living skills, mobility, Braille, computer skills, and alternative communication early, so they can maintain independence and participation for as long as possible. |
The main principle is proactive and hastened learning for long-term adaptation. Since JNCL is a progressive neurodegenerative disease, students gradually lose abilities over time. Education should therefore prepare students early for future challenges, not wait until problems become severe.
In page 1, Abstract, paragraph 1, the article states that a key concept for students with JNCL is “proactive” and “hastened” learning. It explains that education should give early emphasis to adaptive skills needed in later disease stages, because new learning will become more difficult later.
In page 2, section 2 “Childhood dementia,” paragraph 5, the paper explains the idea of a “window of opportunity for learning” before significant cognitive decline. It also says proactive learning should include orientation and mobility, daily living skills, Braille, computer skills, and augmentative/alternative communication.
In page 8, Conclusion, paragraph 3, the article says educational support should have a life-long perspective and should help the affected individual adapt from early childhood to adult living. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 15 |
What does the integration of music therapy demonstrate about special education approaches?
|
That cognitive support can include emotional and sensory pathways. |
|
I choose because the article explains that music therapy did not only entertain students with JNCL. It helped support communication, memory, movement, emotional well-being, relaxation, and social contact. This shows that special education does not have to use only normal classroom teaching. It can also use music, sound, rhythm, emotion, and sensory experience to help students learn and connect with others. |
The main principle is interdisciplinary special education. This means special education can combine different fields, such as education, therapy, psychology, communication support, and music therapy, to help students with complex needs.
In page 5, section 3.3.5 “Musical activities and music therapy for children with JNCL,” paragraph 1, the article explains that music activities and music therapy were studied because students with JNCL face increasing communication difficulties as the disease progresses.
In page 6, section 3.3.5.1 “Music and communication,” paragraph 1, the paper says music supported social contact, communication, comfort, learning, stimulation, and relaxation. It also reports that many parents and professionals believed music therapy had a high impact.
In page 6, section 3.3.5.4 “Music and memory,” paragraph 1, the paper explains that parents felt music helped revive memories for children with dementia. This supports the idea that music can help cognition through emotional and sensory pathways. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 16 |
Why is person-centered planning ethically vital for JNCL education?
|
It ensures each learner’s dignity and autonomy despite decline. |
|
I choose because the article explains that students with JNCL gradually lose some abilities, such as vision, speech, memory, movement, and independence. However, even when their abilities decline, they still have the right to make choices, join activities, and be treated with respect.
Person-centered planning is ethically important because it does not see the student only as a patient or a disabled person. It looks at the student as a person with feelings, interests, preferences, dignity, and life goals. |
This answer is supported by the principle of person-centered planning and autonomy. On page 7, section 3.5, the article explains that individuals with JNCL need a person-centered approach adapted to their needs. It also emphasizes autonomy, participation, interdependence, and life flow. On page 8, the Conclusion states that interventions should be person-centered rather than standardized. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 17 |
Which educational strategy best facilitates the transition from childhood to adulthood in JNCL individuals?
|
Gradually increasing external scaffolding and interdependence. |
|
I choose because the article explains that when children with JNCL grow into young adults, their disease progresses. They may lose some independence in vision, movement, speech, memory, and daily living skills. So, instead of expecting them to be completely independent, teachers, families, and caregivers should gradually increase support.
Scaffoldingmeans support that helps the student do activities they cannot do alone. For JNCL students, this support may need to increase over time so they can still participate in daily life, learning, and community activities. |
This answer is supported by the theory of scaffolding and interdependence. On page 7, section 3.5, the article explains that young adults with JNCL may move from independence back to interdependence because of disease progression. It also states that scaffolding should increase over time to sustain participation. Figure 5 on page 8 shows that full participation can continue when suitable support is provided. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 18 |
What is the broader implication of the JNCL and Education Project for global inclusive education?
|
It offers a transferable model for proactive, individualized educational systems. |
|
I choose because the JNCL and Education Project does not only help students with JNCL. It also gives a useful model for inclusive education in general. The project shows that students with complex and progressive disabilities need education that is early, proactive, individualized, flexible, and life-long.
This means schools should not wait until students lose abilities before helping them. Instead, schools should plan ahead, assess each student’s needs, and adjust support as the student changes over time. This idea can be applied to other students with neurodegenerative diseases or special educational needs. |
This answer is supported by the principle of inclusive and individualized education. On page 1, the paper states that children with NCL disorders belong in school and should be supported to participate fully. On page 8, the Conclusion explains that the project’s educational approach may be useful for other NCL disorders and other pediatric neurodegenerative conditions. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 19 |
According to Fig. 4, which policy feature shows the most consistent moderate-to-strong correlation with multiple dimensions of social sustainability (e.g., cross-income interaction, community participation, and social networks)?
|
Developer Incentives |
|
I choose because in Fig. 4, the column for Developer Incentives shows several moderate correlations with many social sustainability outcomes. These include areas like cross-income interaction, employment metrics, income progression, resident retention, and social networks.
This means that when developers receive suitable incentives, they may be more willing to build or support affordable housing projects in a way that helps different income groups live together and stay connected in the community. |
The main principle is correlation interpretation. In the figure, each color shows the strength of the relationship between a policy feature and a social sustainability outcome. According to the legend, orange = weak correlation, green = moderate correlation, and blue = strong correlation. So, the best answer should be the policy feature that shows moderate or strong colors across many outcome areas.
In Fig. 4: Policy Features and Social Sustainability Outcomes, Developer Incentives has many green cells, showing repeated moderate relationships with several social outcomes. This suggests that developer incentives are not linked to only one result, but can support many parts of social sustainability. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 20 |
Based on Fig. 5, what does the change in participation model from age 13 (Time 1) to age 20 (Time 2) suggest about educational planning for individuals with JNCL?
|
Support should gradually shift from fostering independence toward structured interdependence. |
|
I choose because Fig. 5 shows that the person with JNCL still has 100% participation at both ages, but the type of support changes. At age 13, the person can rely more on independence. At age 20, because the disease progresses, the person needs more interdependence, technical aids, and physical adaptations.
This means education should not force students with JNCL to be fully independent forever. Instead, teachers and caregivers should slowly adjust support so the student can still join activities and make choices, even when they need more help. |
This answer is supported by the theory of interdependence and scaffolding. On page 7, section 3.5, the article explains that young adults with JNCL may shift from independence back to interdependence because of disease progression. Page 8, Fig. 5 shows that full participation can continue when the right support is provided. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|