| 1 |
Which implication can be logically inferred if climate feedback mechanisms are underestimated in predictive models?
|
2. Future climate risks could be systematically underpredicted |
|
|
If the input is underestimated then the output will logically continue to appear underrated too. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 2 |
If current climate models fail to adequately represent cloud–aerosol interactions, which outcome is most likely?
|
3. Misrepresentation of radiative forcing effects |
|
|
If models fail to collect data sufficiently, the results will be turned in as negative. Out of all the choices, choice 3 is the only logically negative one. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 3 |
Based on the article’s insights, which scenario would most challenge existing climate adaptation strategies?
|
3. Uniform warming across all regions |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 4 |
Why does the article suggest that regional climate projections must be interpreted differently from global averages?
|
3. Local feedbacks and vulnerabilities vary significantly |
|
Regional climate projections are more concentrated on a specific area, whereas global averages take everything into account and converts the data into the mean result. |
Regional climate projections are more concentrated on a specific area, whereas global averages take everything into account and converts the data into the mean result. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 5 |
Which factor would most strengthen confidence in long-term climate projections discussed in the article?
|
2. Expanding historical observational datasets |
|
|
Out of all the choices, choice 2 appears to have potential to improve long-term projections. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 6 |
From an engineering perspective, which climate insight most directly informs infrastructure design resilience?
|
3. Increased frequency of extreme events |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 7 |
How does integrating ocean, atmosphere, and cryosphere data improve climate risk assessment?
|
3. By capturing coupled system dynamics |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 8 |
Which conclusion about mitigation efforts is best supported by the article’s analysis?
|
3. Delayed action increases system-level risks |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 9 |
Why is transparent communication of uncertainty essential for climate-related decision making?
|
3. It supports risk-informed planning |
|
|
If communication between parties aren't transparent, there are several possibilities of things going wrong. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 10 |
Based on the article, which research direction would most enhance future climate preparedness?
|
3. Coupled human–Earth system modeling |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 11 |
When optimizing CRISPR therapies, which trade-off is most critical to manage?
|
2. Precision versus delivery efficiency |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 12 |
If a delivery system triggers a strong immune response, what is the most likely consequence for CRISPR therapy effectiveness?
|
3. Enhanced target specificity |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 13 |
Why does the article argue that off-target analysis must be context-specific rather than universal?
|
2. Gene expression environments vary by tissue |
|
|
Different context can refer to different off-targets. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 14 |
Which factor most limits the immediate scalability of CRISPR-based therapies?
|
2. Ethical objections alone |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 15 |
Why are monogenic diseases considered more suitable initial targets for CRISPR therapy development?
|
2. Disease mechanisms are genetically well-defined |
|
Monogenic diseases are easier to target and configure compared to other diseases. |
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 16 |
Which consideration most strongly justifies cautious progression to late-stage clinical trials?
|
4. Availability of alternative technologies |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 17 |
Why does the article suggest that CRISPR challenges existing regulatory frameworks?
|
3. It combines biological intervention with permanent genetic modification |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 18 |
Which ethical concern is most directly linked to the technical capability of CRISPR?
|
3. Germline modification risks |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 19 |
What development would most accelerate responsible clinical translation of CRISPR therapies?
|
3. Improved delivery specificity and safety profiling |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 20 |
Based on the figure and the discussion in the article, which consideration most strongly explains why ex vivo CRISPR-based gene therapy has progressed faster toward clinical translation than many in vivo approaches?
|
1. Ex vivo approaches eliminate the need for delivery vectors such as viral or nanoparticle systems |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|