| 1 |
Which integrated engineering approach would most effectively reduce GHG emissions from both livestock and manure management?
|
2. Developing anaerobic digestion systems for biogas recovery |
|
Anaerobic digestion helps convert livestock manure and plant residues into biogas, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and also producing organic fertilizer usable in agriculture. |
based on waste-to-resource and climate-smart agriculture principles, where integrated anaerobic digestion simultaneously reduces GHG emissions, recycles nutrients, and produces renewable energy, enhancing sustainable livestock and manure management. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 2 |
What is the main ecological risk of converting land to cropland despite productivity gains?
|
2. Loss of carbon sinks and soil degradation |
|
Even though converting land to cropland increases productivity, it destroys carbon sinks and degrades soil, impacting ecosystem sustainability and increasing greenhouse gas emissions. |
Converting land to cropland often involves trading short-term benefits for long-term ecological damage, particularly by contributing to climate change and the destruction of soil fertility. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 3 |
Which model best represents circular economy principles in agricultural waste management?
|
2. Energy–nutrient recovery loops from organic waste |
|
Agricultural waste management that creates energy and nutrient recovery loops, such as producing biogas from livestock manure and using organic fertilizer from crop residues, aligns with circular economy principles because it reduces waste, recycles resources, and enhances agricultural system sustainability. |
The Circular Economy is an economic model focused on eliminating waste and keeping resources in use for as long as possible. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 4 |
How can precision irrigation systems contribute to sustainability in waste-adapted agriculture?
|
1. By reducing water waste and nutrient leaching |
|
Precision irrigation systems help deliver water according to the specific needs of crops, reducing water waste and nutrient leaching from organic fertilizers or agricultural waste. |
Precision Irrigation Systems utilize sensor technology and data (such as soil moisture and weather conditions) to deliver the optimal amount of water according to the specific needs of the crops and the local environment. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 5 |
Which national policy initiative aligns best with environmental adaptation engineering for agriculture?
|
2. Promoting integrated waste-to-energy programs |
|
It helps farmers and the agricultural sector use plant and animal waste efficiently, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and generate renewable energy. |
Environmental Adaptation Engineering focuses on designing resilient systems that can mitigate negative impacts from environmental risks (such as climate change and pollution) while maintaining sustainable productivity. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 6 |
Why is ecosystem-based engineering more sustainable than conventional input-intensive farming?
|
3. It strengthens symbiotic relationships and self-regulating processes |
|
Ecosystem-based Engineering focuses on designing agricultural systems that mimic and utilize natural mechanisms, which contrasts with Conventional Input-Intensive Farming. |
A sustainable system is one that utilizes biological relationships and natural mechanisms to maintain its functionality autonomously, without high reliance on external, high-input factors. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 7 |
What key factor determines the efficiency of biogas systems in agricultural applications?
|
1. Feedstock composition and temperature control |
|
The efficiency of a biogas system depends on the type of organic feedstock, such as animal manure and crop residues, and temperature control to ensure microorganisms fully decompose the material and maximize biogas production. |
is process optimization in anaerobic digestion: proper feedstock mix and stable temperature maximize biogas yield and nutrient recovery, supporting sustainable waste-to-energy agriculture. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 8 |
Which innovation most directly lowers the carbon footprint of agricultural production?
|
1. Solar-powered waste treatment units |
|
Using solar-powered waste treatment units helps reduce fossil fuel consumption, lower greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural waste management, and generate clean energy from waste. |
The key idea is low-carbon and renewable technology integration in agriculture, where solar-powered waste management minimizes greenhouse gas emissions, improves energy efficiency, and supports sustainable, climate-smart farming. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 9 |
If a region’s livestock emissions account for 50% of its agricultural GHG output, what is the most logical first step in adaptation engineering?
|
2. Implementing methane capture and composting systems |
|
When greenhouse gas emissions from livestock are high, methane capture from manure and composting can reduce emissions and convert waste into usable resources for agriculture. |
The principle is targeted emission mitigation through waste-to-resource strategies, where managing livestock waste reduces greenhouse gases while supporting sustainable nutrient recycling. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 10 |
Why is the integration of multiple stimuli (thermal, pH, magnetic) a key innovation in SMHs?
|
1. It enhances the precision and versatility of shape recovery |
|
The integration of multiple stimuli, such as temperature, pH, or magnetic fields, enables SMHs to recover their shape precisely and respond flexibly to varying environmental conditions. |
SMHs that exhibit multi-stimuli responsiveness are considered a crucial innovation because they allow for more complex and precise control over the material's function. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 11 |
What structural feature most influences the recovery capability of SMHs?
|
1. Polymer network crosslinking density |
|
Crosslinking Density is the key structural property that controls the strength of the permanent netpoints, which is the core mechanism controlling the shape memory and shape recovery of SMHs. |
SMHs function by relying on a two-component polymer structure, where the Crosslinking Density plays a crucial role in determining the shape recovery capability. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 12 |
In designing an implantable scaffold, which SMH property is most critical for minimally invasive surgery?
|
1. Shape recovery at body temperature |
|
SMHs must be able to be inserted into the body in a compact or compressed form and recover their designed shape once inside, allowing the structure to expand or adjust safely without requiring large incisions.
|
For minimally invasive surgery, the material must respond to body temperature to automatically recover its shape, supporting in-body applications and tissue scaffolding.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 13 |
How can nanocomposite modification enhance SMH performance?
|
1. By improving mechanical strength and bioactivity |
|
Incorporating nanocomposites into SMHs enhances their structural integrity and mechanical robustness, while also improving interactions with cells or tissues, making them more effective for biomedical applications. |
Enhancing material properties via nanocomposites increases both durability and biological compatibility, which are critical for functional and safe biomedical scaffolds. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 14 |
Which combination of challenges currently limits SMH commercialization?
|
1. Scalability, cost, and reproducibility |
|
Producing SMHs on a large scale is technically challenging, expensive, and sometimes yields inconsistent properties, which limits their commercial availability. |
SMHs are advanced materials with high medical and biological potential. However, the translation of these innovations from the laboratory to commercialization often faces major challenges related to manufacturing and economics. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 15 |
Why is developing biodegradable SMHs vital for sustainable healthcare?
|
1. It ensures safe material breakdown and reduces post-treatment waste |
|
Biodegradable SMHs naturally degrade after fulfilling their medical function, avoiding accumulation of foreign materials in the body and minimizing medical waste. |
Sustainability in healthcare requires materials that perform their function safely and then break down harmlessly, supporting patient safety and reducing environmental impact. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 16 |
Which innovation demonstrates the convergence of SMHs with smart device technology?
|
1. 4D-printed adaptive scaffolds responsive to stimuli |
|
The innovation demonstrating the convergence of Shape Memory Hydrogels SMHs with Smart Device Technology is the combination of advanced manufacturing technology 4D Printing) and smart responsive materials. |
4D Printing is a fabrication technique that uses the responsiveness of SMHs to create devices capable of autonomous function and adaptation to the biological environment, making it the clearest example of the convergence of smart materials and digital technology. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 17 |
How can adjusting hydrogel porosity affect tissue regeneration outcomes?
|
1. It enhances nutrient transport and cell proliferation |
|
Optimally adjusting the porosity in hydrogels is the most critical physical factor in supporting the necessary biological processes for successful tissue regeneration. |
In Tissue Engineering, scaffolds function as an artificial extracellular matrix, which must support cell growth, vascularization, and new tissue formation. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 18 |
Which research focus would most advance the next generation of SMHs?
|
1. Multifunctional and self-healing hydrogels with dynamic feedback control |
|
Research on hydrogels that respond to multiple stimuli, repair themselves, and adjust dynamically enables advanced biomedical applications, such as adaptive implants, drug delivery systems, and tissue scaffolds. |
Combining multifunctionality, self-healing, and feedback responsiveness maximizes the material’s adaptability, durability, and compatibility with biological systems key for next-generation smart biomaterials. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 19 |
Based on the diagram illustrating the steps of anaerobic digestion of agricultural waste, which operational adjustment would most effectively optimize biogas (CH₄ and CO₂) yield while maintaining system stability?
|
2. Maintaining balanced pH ranges for sequential microbial activities across stages |
|
Maintaining a balanced pH across all stages, particularly maintaining the optimal pH for Methanogenesis, synchronizes the activities of all four microbial stages, ensuring system stability and maximum efficiency. |
According to the diagram Fig. 11, the anaerobic digestion (AD) process consists of four continuous main stages, each relying on different microorganisms and having its own optimal pH range. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 20 |
Based on the schematic illustrating the transition between Shape I and Shape II in SMHs, which material design strategy would most effectively improve controlled shape recovery for biomedical applications?
|
2. Enhancing dynamic crosslinks responsive to multiple external stimuli such as temperature and enzymes |
|
Dynamic crosslinks allow the hydrogel to reversibly deform and recover its pre-defined shape when triggered by specific stimuli, which is essential for precise and safe biomedical applications. |
Stimuli-responsive dynamic networks provide controlled shape recovery, adaptability, and biocompatibility, unlike irreversible or non-responsive structures that limit functionality. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|