| 1 |
Which integrated engineering approach would most effectively reduce GHG emissions from both livestock and manure management?
|
2. Developing anaerobic digestion systems for biogas recovery |
|
Livestock and manure are major sources of emissions. |
Anaerobic digestion minimizes emissions release from manure decomposition |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 2 |
What is the main ecological risk of converting land to cropland despite productivity gains?
|
2. Loss of carbon sinks and soil degradation |
|
When natural land is converted into cropland, it reduces the area that naturally stores carbon which leads to loss of carbon sinks. |
Reducing the number of the area that stores carbon leads to loss of carbon sinks. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 3 |
Which model best represents circular economy principles in agricultural waste management?
|
2. Energy–nutrient recovery loops from organic waste |
|
Using organic waste to recover both energy and nutrients. |
This model closes the resource loop by turning organic waste into renewable energy. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 4 |
How can precision irrigation systems contribute to sustainability in waste-adapted agriculture?
|
1. By reducing water waste and nutrient leaching |
|
Precision irrigation applies water only when crops need it., which reduces water loss and prevents nutrients from being washed away. |
Using water efficiently keeps nutrients in the soil for crops. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 5 |
Which national policy initiative aligns best with environmental adaptation engineering for agriculture?
|
2. Promoting integrated waste-to-energy programs |
|
Promoting integrated waste-to-energy programs turn agricultural and livestock waste into usable energy while managing pollution. |
By converting waste into energy, the policy supports sustainable agriculture. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 6 |
Why is ecosystem-based engineering more sustainable than conventional input-intensive farming?
|
3. It strengthens symbiotic relationships and self-regulating processes |
|
Ecosystem-based engineering uses natural interactions among plants and soil, this reduces the need for chemical inputs which make the system more sustainable. |
Promoting healthy soil and natural nutrient cycles, allow productivity while protecting the environment. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 7 |
What key factor determines the efficiency of biogas systems in agricultural applications?
|
1. Feedstock composition and temperature control |
|
The efficiency of biogas production depends on the type of organic material used and maintaining the right temperature. |
Feedstock composition and stable temperature control creates optimal condition for agricultural waste to break down into biogas. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 8 |
Which innovation most directly lowers the carbon footprint of agricultural production?
|
1. Solar-powered waste treatment units |
|
Using solar energy to treat agricultural waste reduces the usage of fossil fuels, cutting greenhouse gas emissions. |
Solar-powered treatment systems manage waste efficiently while generating renewable energy. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 9 |
If a region’s livestock emissions account for 50% of its agricultural GHG output, what is the most logical first step in adaptation engineering?
|
2. Implementing methane capture and composting systems |
|
Since livestock produce the most emissions, capturing methane and composting waste reduces the largest source. |
methane capture and composting systems lower greenhouse gas release and recycle nutrients. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 10 |
Why is the integration of multiple stimuli (thermal, pH, magnetic) a key innovation in SMHs?
|
1. It enhances the precision and versatility of shape recovery |
|
Using multiple stimuli allows the hydrogel to respond more accurately. |
Combining thermal, pH and magnetic triggers allows precise control of shape changes. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 11 |
What structural feature most influences the recovery capability of SMHs?
|
1. Polymer network crosslinking density |
|
Polymer network crosslinking density controls how well the hydrogel can return to its original shape. |
optimized crosslinking allows SMHs to recover their shape efficiently after deformation. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 12 |
In designing an implantable scaffold, which SMH property is most critical for minimally invasive surgery?
|
1. Shape recovery at body temperature |
|
The scaffold must change shape at body temperature. |
Shape recovery at body temperature allows the scaffold to expand inside the body. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 13 |
How can nanocomposite modification enhance SMH performance?
|
1. By improving mechanical strength and bioactivity |
|
Adding nanocomposite modification strengthens the hydrogel and enhances interactions with cells. |
Nanocomposite modification increases mechanical strength making SMHs more effective. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 14 |
Which combination of challenges currently limits SMH commercialization?
|
1. Scalability, cost, and reproducibility |
|
Producing SMHs is expensive and hard to reproduce consistently. |
It's difficult to mass produce SMHs because of the high costs. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 15 |
Why is developing biodegradable SMHs vital for sustainable healthcare?
|
1. It ensures safe material breakdown and reduces post-treatment waste |
|
Biodegradable SMHs break down safely after use while preventing accumulation of medical waste. |
Biodegradable SMHs break down safely after use. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 16 |
Which innovation demonstrates the convergence of SMHs with smart device technology?
|
1. 4D-printed adaptive scaffolds responsive to stimuli |
|
4D-printed SMHs respond to environmental stimuli. |
4D-printed adaptive scaffolds can change shape in response to stimuli, demonstrating the combination of SMHs with smart device technology. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 17 |
How can adjusting hydrogel porosity affect tissue regeneration outcomes?
|
1. It enhances nutrient transport and cell proliferation |
|
Increasing hydrogel porosity improves the movement of nutrients and oxygen to cells. |
Better nutrient and oxygen transport promotes cell growth and tissue regeneration. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 18 |
Which research focus would most advance the next generation of SMHs?
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 19 |
Based on the diagram illustrating the steps of anaerobic digestion of agricultural waste, which operational adjustment would most effectively optimize biogas (CH₄ and CO₂) yield while maintaining system stability?
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 20 |
Based on the schematic illustrating the transition between Shape I and Shape II in SMHs, which material design strategy would most effectively improve controlled shape recovery for biomedical applications?
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|