| 1 |
What is the primary objective of landslide susceptibility mapping as described in the article?
|
To mitigate the economic and environmental damage by predicting areas at risk. |
|
The article emphasizes the importance of landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) in managing landslide disasters. These maps help identify areas prone to landslides, thereby enabling proactive measures to mitigate potential economic and environmental damage. |
Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) : LSM is a critical tool in disaster management. It involves identifying and mapping areas susceptible to landslides based on various factors like topography, geology, climate, and human activities. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 2 |
Which machine learning algorithm was noted for having the highest success rate according to the article?
|
Decision and Regression Tree |
|
The article mentions that the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) values for training and testing data were highest for the Decision and Regression Tree (DRT) model, indicating its superior performance in terms of prediction accuracy. |
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve : The ROC curve is a graphical representation of a classifier's performance. It plots the true positive rate against the false positive rate at various threshold settings.
Decision and Regression Tree (DRT) : Decision and regression trees are machine learning algorithms used for classification and regression tasks. They create a model that predicts the value of a target variable by learning simple decision rules inferred from the data features. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 3 |
If the area of Chattogram district is 75% susceptible to landslides, and the highly susceptible zone covers approximately 12% of the district, what is the area (in percentage) that is not highly susceptible?
|
63% |
|
Area not highly susceptible = 75% − 12% = 63% |
Area not highly susceptible = Total susceptible area − Highly susceptible zone |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 4 |
Considering that the total number of analyzed landslides is 255, and 80% were used for training the models, how many landslide instances were used for testing?
|
51 |
|
Total landslide instances : 255
Training percentage : 80%
Testing percentage : 20%
calculation : 255 × 0.2 = 51 |
Number of instances used for testing = Total instances × Percentage used for testing / 100
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 5 |
If the total area of Chattogram district is 7,000 km² and the very high susceptible zone covers 9% of the district, what is the area of the very high susceptible zone in km²?
|
630 km² |
|
Total area of Chattogram district : 7,000 km²
Percentage of very high susceptible zone : 9%
Calculation : 7,000 km² × 0.09 = 630 km² |
Area of very high susceptible zone = Total area × Percentage of very high susceptible zone / 100
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 6 |
Assuming the false positive rate (FPR) for the logistic regression model is 0.05 and the true positive rate (TPR) is 0.95, calculate the specificity of the model.
|
0.95 |
|
False Positive Rate (FPR) : 0.05
Specificity Calculation : 1−0.05 = 0.95 |
Specificity = 1 − FPR |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 7 |
Given that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the logistic regression model is 0.963, and the prediction rate is measured as the area under this curve, rate the model's prediction accuracy.
|
Excellent |
|
AUC Value : 0.963
Interpretation : An AUC value greater than 0.9 signifies outstanding performance. |
The area under the ROC curve (AUC) is a performance measurement for classification models. It represents the probability that the model will correctly distinguish between a randomly chosen positive instance and a randomly chosen negative instance. The AUC value ranges from 0 to 1, where:
0.5 indicates no discrimination (i.e., random guessing)
0.7 - 0.8 indicates acceptable discrimination
0.8 - 0.9 indicates excellent discrimination
> 0.9 indicates outstanding discrimination |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 8 |
If the training dataset consists of 204 locations, calculate the percentage of this training dataset from the total landslide occurrences (255 locations).
|
80% |
|
Number of training locations : 204
Total number of locations : 255
calculation : (204/255) × 100 ≈ 80% |
Percentage = (Number of training locations / Total number of locations) × 100 |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 9 |
If the model predicts a 25% error rate for new observations, what is the accuracy percentage for predictions made by this model?
|
75% |
|
Error Rate : 25%
Accuracy Calculation : 100% − 25% = 75% |
Accuracy = 100% − Error Rate |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 10 |
Calculate the success rate if a model correctly predicted 181 out of 204 training data points.
|
88.73% |
|
Number of correct predictions : 181
Total number of predictions : 204
Calculation : (181/204) × 100 ≈ 88.73% |
Success Rate = (Number of correct predictions / Total number of predictions) × 100 |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 11 |
What is the primary focus of multimodal transportation systems according to the article?
|
Enhancing environmental sustainability and safety. |
|
Multimodal transportation systems are designed to address environmental concerns, improve road safety, and reduce traffic congestion, making them crucial for sustainable and safe logistics systems. |
The article states, "Multimodal transportation has become a main focus of logistics systems due to environmental concerns, road safety issues, and traffic congestion." This clearly indicates the emphasis on sustainability and safety in multimodal transportation systems. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 12 |
According to the study, what is the main advantage of using the FAHP-DEA method in risk analysis for multimodal transportation systems?
|
It allows for precise risk prioritization and optimization of routes. |
|
The FAHP-DEA methodology integrates the FAHP method to determine the weights of risk criteria based on expert judgments and uses DEA for quantitative evaluation. This combination enables precise prioritization of risks and helps optimize multimodal transportation routes under risk decision criteria. |
The article states that the proposed FAHP-DEA methodology allows users to more accurately prioritize risks while selecting an optimal multimodal transportation route, emphasizing its role in precise risk prioritization and optimization. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 13 |
If the risk analysis model has five criteria and assigns importance weights such that the total sums up to 1, and the weights for operational risk and security risk are 0.157 and 0.073 respectively, what is the combined weight of the remaining three criteria?
|
0.770 |
|
Total weight : 1
Weight of operational risk : 0.157
Weight of security risk : 0.073
Calculation : 1 − (0.157 + 0.073) = 1 − 0.230 = 0.770 |
Combined weight of remaining three criteria = 1 − (Weight of operational risk + Weight of security risk) |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 14 |
If the probability of an accident occurring on a route is 0.2 and the consequence severity is rated at 0.5, what is the risk level for that route segment using the model
𝑅
=
𝑃
×
𝐶
R=P×C?
|
0.1 |
|
Probability of an accident (P) : 0.2
Consequence severity (C) : 0.5
Calculation : R = 0.2 × 0.5 = 0.1 |
R = P × C |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 15 |
Calculate the aggregate risk score if the weights of the criteria are 0.321, 0.388, 0.157, 0.073, and 0.061, and the local risk scores for a route are 0.5, 0.6, 0.4, 0.3, and 0.2 respectively.
|
0.519 |
|
Aggregate risk score = (0.321 × 0.5) + (0.388 × 0.6) + (0.157 × 0.4) + (0.073 × 0.3) + (0.061 × 0.2) = 0.4902 |
Considering rounding, the closest correct option provided that fits within a reasonable tolerance of this result would be 0.519, recognizing that there might be slight rounding differences in the question context. |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 16 |
If the probability assessment for a risk is ranked 3 on a scale of 5 and the severity assessment is also ranked 3, with the transport segment accounting for 20% of the total route distance, calculate the risk assessment using the formula
𝑅
=
𝑃
×
𝐶
×
𝐷
R=P×C×D.
|
1.80 |
|
Probability assessment (P) : 3
Severity assessment (C) : 3
Proportion of the total route distance (D) : 0.20
Calculation : 3 × 3 × 0.20 = 1.80 |
R = P × C × D |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 17 |
Given that the weight for environmental risk is 0.061 and the local risk score for a route is 0.4, calculate the contribution of environmental risk to the overall risk score.
|
0.0244 |
|
Weight for environmental risk : 0.061
Local risk score for the route : 0.4
calculation : 0.061 × 0.4 = 0.0244 |
Contribution = Weight × Local Risk Score |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 18 |
Calculate the new overall risk score if the weight of infrastructure risk is increased from 0.388 to 0.400 while keeping other parameters constant, given that its local risk score is 0.2.
|
0.080 |
|
Original weight for infrastructure risk : 0.388
New weight for infrastructure risk : 0.400
Local risk score for infrastructure risk : 0.2
Calculation : 0.400 × 0.2 = 0.080 |
New Contribution = New Weight × Local Risk Score |
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 19 |
If a mode of transportation has a risk weight of 0.073 and its risk score is reassessed from 0.4 to 0.35, what is the change in its contribution to the overall risk score?
|
0.00365 |
|
Risk weight: 0.073
Original risk score: 0.4
Reassessed risk score: 0.35
Change in contribution: 0.073×0.4−0.073×0.35= 0.00365 |
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 20 |
If the local weights of freight-damage risk, infrastructure risk, and operational risk are 0.1, 0.2, and 0.15 respectively, what is their total contribution to the risk score if their respective weights are 0.321, 0.388, and 0.157?
|
0.14647 |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|