| 1 |
What was identified as a significant challenge in staying away from others within the household during isolation and quarantine?
|
Household transmission, especially for parents and caregivers |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 2 |
According to the study, what factor significantly influenced participants' decisions to follow isolation and quarantine guidelines?
|
Availability of testing |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 3 |
What harm reduction strategies were commonly reported by participants during isolation and quarantine?
|
Maintaining distance from others and wearing masks |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 4 |
What financial concern was highlighted as a barrier to adherence to isolation and quarantine measures?
|
Fear of job loss |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 5 |
Essay | What were the key challenges faced by individuals in staying away from others within the household during isolation and quarantine?
|
The lack of facilities for quarantine and isolation in the sites for internally displaced people (IDPs) was found to be a barrier to the adoption of isolation and quarantine measures by IDPs. |
|
The study involved 36 individual interviews and eight focus groups with 68 participants of whom IDPs represented 72.3%. The main challenges reported on IDP sites included difficulties in contacting positive cases, a lack of facilities for quarantine and isolation, a lack of physical space for building new facilities, and a lack of financial resources to support IDPs during isolation and quarantine. The difficulties reported included: changes in social behavior and practices, fear of stigma, a poor level of literacy, and language barriers. To address those difficulties, the local initiatives developed by IDPs included strengthening the awareness of IDPs on COVID-19, early warning of sites’ leaders about positive and suspected cases, and setting up a toll-free number to facilitate access to appropriate information on COVID-19.
|
|
10 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 6 |
What is the main concern highlighted in the study regarding the research effort in African urban ecology?
|
Underrepresentation compared to other continents. |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 7 |
According to the study, what factor is suggested as a potential reason for the low research effort in African urban ecology?
|
Lack of economic resources. |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 8 |
Why does the study recommend funding bodies to finance the education of local urban ecologists in Africa?
|
To minimize the influence of economic factors on research efforts. |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 9 |
What is the significance of South Africa in African urban ecology research, as highlighted in the study?
|
It contributes significantly due to early engagement in urban ecology research. |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 10 |
Essay | Examine the factors contributing to the underrepresentation of African urban ecology research, as discussed in the study. Discuss the potential implications of this underrepresentation on global urban ecology knowledge and biodiversity conservation efforts. Propose actionable recommendations for fostering increased research efforts and collaboration in African urban ecology.
|
|
|
African urban ecology is understudied.
•
There are important geographic, ecological and scientific biases.
•
Urban ecology is significantly more studied in wealthier African countries.
•
More urbanized areas (now or in the future) are not the main focus of study.
•
We need to redirect our priorities regarding urban ecology in Africa. |
|
10 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 11 |
What is the primary reason suggested for the sudden increase in research papers on AI acceptability in healthcare imaging within the last four years?
|
Slow diffusion of AI in diagnostic imaging fields |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 12 |
What does the review propose regarding the identified factors influencing AI acceptability?
|
They provide a comprehensive and systematic approach for study design |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 13 |
What is the main limitation discussed in the section on "Theoretical frameworks and ad-hoc approaches used"?
|
Frameworks lack consideration of healthcare-specific issues |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 14 |
What recommendation does the review make regarding conceptual clarity and terminology consistency?
|
Clearly define and uniformly use terminology associated with acceptability |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 15 |
Essay | Please Discuss the key findings and implications of the scoping review on healthcare professional acceptability of AI in diagnostic imaging. Highlight the identified factors, theoretical frameworks used, and the recommendations made for future research in this domain.
|
|
|
Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has the potential to transform medical practice within the medical imaging industry and materially improve productivity and patient outcomes. However, low acceptability of AI as a digital healthcare intervention among medical professionals threatens to undermine user uptake levels, hinder meaningful and optimal value-added engagement, and ultimately prevent these promising benefits from being realised. Understanding the factors underpinning AI acceptability will be vital for medical institutions to pinpoint areas of deficiency and improvement within their AI implementation strategies. This scoping review aims to survey the literature to provide a comprehensive summary of the key factors influencing AI acceptability among healthcare professionals in medical imaging domains and the different approaches which have been taken to investigate them. |
|
10 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 16 |
What is the primary focus of the systematic review discussed in the passage?
|
Workplace violence (WPV) prevalence in diagnostic radiography |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 17 |
According to the passage, which profession is typically considered to encounter WPV more frequently than others in the healthcare sector?
|
Diagnostic radiographers |
|
A WPV policy should be developed in every clinical workplace. Even if such policy is available, its enforcement including policy awareness boosting, and encouraging incident reporting and support seeking will be essential for reducing WPV. More survey studies based on WHO WPV questionnaire should be conducted for strengthening evidence base. |
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 18 |
What is identified as the most common type of WPV in the included studies, as mentioned in the passage?
|
Verbal abuse and threats |
|
Verbal abuse was the most common type, and physical abuse was the second |
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 19 |
According to the ILO/ICN/WHO/PSI framework guidelines mentioned in the passage, what is suggested as a key measure for addressing the WPV issue in medical radiation sciences (MRS)?
|
Developing and implementing a WPV policy |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 20 |
Essay | According to the ILO/ICN/WHO/PSI framework guidelines, what is emphasized as the most important measure for addressing the issue of Workplace Violence (WPV) in Medical Radiation Sciences (MRS)?
|
Implications for practice: A WPV policy should be developed in every clinical workplace. Even if such policy is available, its enforcement including policy awareness boosting, and encouraging incident reporting and support seeking will be essential for reducing WPV. More survey studies based on WHO WPV questionnaire should be conducted for strengthening evidence base. |
|
Introduction: According to World Health Organization (WHO), workplace violence (WPV) is a significant issue in healthcare. However, no systematic review on WPV in medical radiation science (MRS) has been published yet. The purpose of this paper is to systematically review prevalence of WPV in MRS and its risk factors. Methods: Electronic scholarly publication databases, namely EBSCOhost/Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature Ultimate, PubMed/Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Wiley Online Library were used for literature search to identify articles about WPV in MRS published over last 10 years as per preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. To facilitate comparisons of the WPV prevalence and relative importance of individual risk factors across the included studies, their reported absolute figures of findings were used to synthesize respective percentages (if not stated). Results: Twelve papers met the selection criteria and were included. This review shows that the WPV prevalence were 69.2e100 % (whole career) and 46.1e83.0 % (last 12 months) in diagnostic radiography, 63.0e84.0 % (whole career) in radiation therapy, 57.6 % in medical sonography (last 12 months), and 46.8 % (last 6 months) in nuclear medicine. The identified WPV risk factors included intoxicated patients, staff stress, feeling of inadequacy resulting in self-protection, more vulnerable practitioners (female, <40 years old and <5-year experience), working in radiation therapy treatment room, emergency department , examination room, general radiography, public hospital, and non-examination and waiting areas, long patient waiting time, night shift, overcrowding environment, unable to meet patients'/family members' expectations, miscommunication, patient handling, inadequate staff and security measures, interaction with colleagues, and lone working. Conclusion: The WPV risk in diagnostic radiography and radiation therapy appears extremely high as a result of the aforementioned risk factors. Nevertheless, these study findings should be used with caution due to potential non-response bias. Implications for practice: A WPV policy should be developed in every clinical workplace. Even if such policy is available, its enforcement including policy awareness boosting, and encouraging incident reporting and support seeking will be essential for reducing WPV. More survey studies based on WHO WPV questionnaire should be conducted for strengthening evidence base. |
|
10 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|