| 1 |
What is the primary objective of the meta-analysis on ChatGPT in education?
|
4. To measure students’ dependency on AI tools |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 2 |
Why is a meta-analysis an appropriate method for this study?
|
1. It allows real-time observation of students using ChatGPT |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 3 |
According to the article, under which condition does ChatGPT most positively influence learning performance?
|
3. When integrated with instructional scaffolding |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 4 |
Which cognitive skill is most closely associated with higher-order thinking as discussed in the article?
|
3. Critical analysis |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 5 |
How do students generally perceive ChatGPT according to the findings?
|
3. As a supportive and engaging learning aid |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 6 |
What potential risk does the article associate with improper use of ChatGPT?
|
3. Overreliance that weakens critical thinking |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 7 |
Which factor moderates the effectiveness of ChatGPT in learning?
|
3. Instructional design and teacher guidance |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 8 |
Compared to traditional learning tools, ChatGPT is most effective when it is used to:
|
3. Facilitate exploration and inquiry |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 9 |
What educational implication does the article emphasize?
|
3. AI literacy should be integrated into curricula |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 10 |
Which conclusion best reflects the overall findings of the meta-analysis?
|
3. ChatGPT’s impact depends on how it is pedagogically implemented |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 11 |
What is the main finding of the study on social media discourse?
|
3. Ideological alignment structures online discussions |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 12 |
Which global debates were analyzed in the study?
|
2. Climate change, COVID-19, and the Russo-Ukrainian War |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 13 |
What does polarization mean in the context of this study?
|
3. Formation of ideologically opposing communities |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 14 |
Why do influencer categories fail to explain engagement levels?
|
3. Engagement is driven by ideological resonance |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 15 |
Selective exposure refers to users’ tendency to:
|
3. Engage with ideologically aligned content |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 16 |
What does ideological persistence across debates indicate?
|
3. Ideological identity transcends individual issues |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 17 |
How does social media challenge traditional agenda-setting theory?
|
5. By simplifying narratives |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 18 |
Why does the study use Twitter data?
|
2. It allows large-scale analysis of engagement patterns |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 19 |
What risk does polarization pose to democratic societies?
|
3. Fragmentation of shared public discourse |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 20 |
Based on the article selection process shown in the diagram, which factor most strongly supports the
|
1. The large number of articles initially identified from multiple academic databases |
|
|
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|