โจทย์ ปรนัย
What is the primary goal of the article according to its introduction?

This articale is to provide a comprehensive overview of synthetic data in medical imaging

So my thinking is that in this artical the main point is to examining Generative Artificial Intelligence or GAI, Before we use anything new we all need to check how it work for our purpose, And in the artical is to use in Medical, We explore GAI to know the potentail of GAI to diversity medical resources

โจทย์ ปรนัย
How do generative AI models differ from traditional discriminative models in healthcare applications?

Because Mostly GAI models is capable of creating content that diverges from the original training data, But Traditional Discriminative Models Is focused on interpretation or decision making regarding in input data

GAI models is to learn and store the patterns and characteristics of the original training data within their internal parameters, For example we use GAI to discuminative Models, this Discriminative Models are focused on tasks such assed about medical questions or summarizing medical documents that will be really great for medical in the next level right. But for Traditional Discris interpretation or decision making,For example for you to see how different,if a discriminative model classifies an X-ray as showing pneumonia, a generative model could be used to create a new, realistic X-ray image of a patient with or without pneumonia

โจทย์ ปรนัย
What is meant by the term “model as a dataset”?

Because the term of model as a dataset is introduced as a new concept in data sharing,In this concept , generative models learn and store the patterns and characteristics of the original data in their internal parameters (weights)

For the theory ,I think that a generative model's trained internal parameters (weights) effectively become a stand in for the source data by sharing these weights instead of transferring actual,raw images,the model provides an efficient and privacy preserving alternative for others to generate new synthetic images that closely resemble the characteristics and distribution of the original data

โจทย์ ปรนัย
Which statement correctly distinguishes physics-informed and statistical models?

becuse Physics informed models are defined as rule based approaches that generate data by incorporating domain specific knowledge and physics principles

So the theory behind physics informed generative models distinguishes them by their reliance on explicit, predetermined knowledge to generate new data, rather than solely on statistical patterns learned from existing datasets.For example Application in Simulation this models are used to simulate biological phenomena, such as anatomical structures (e.g., a shape model of the femoral bone), physiological processes (e.g., blood flow dynamics in vascular structures), and medical interventions (e.g., simulating the distribution of the radiation dose in radiotherapy planning)

โจทย์ ปรนัย
According to the article, what does the “image generation trilemma” describe?

In the "image generation trilemma" describes the fundamental trade-off among three key, competing aspects of statistical generative models. 1.High Sample Quality 2.Comprehensive Mode Coverage 3.Rapid Sampling Rates

In this practical consequence of this theory is that end users must select a generative model that is balances the desired image quality and speed according to their application.For instance,applications focused on synthetic dataset generation typically prioritize high image quality and comprehensive mode coverage, even if it means sacrificing sampling speed

โจทย์ ปรนัย
What is the Human Turing Test used for in medical image synthesis?

The Human Turing Test is a method of human evaluation that serves as the gold standard for assessing the quality of generated medical images

So human turing Test provides the subjective, clinical validation necessary to ensure that synthetic images meet the high standards of visual accuracy required for medical use,confirming that the generated images are indistinguishable from real patient data to the expert eye

โจทย์ ปรนัย
Which of the following is NOT mentioned as a potential benefit of synthetic data in healthcare?

The sources identify the permanent elimination of all medical biases as an unattainable claim or,conversely, list the persistence and propagation of potential biases as a major challenge for synthetic data

Because perceptual quality and realism are subjective measures, the theory suggests that a wide range of participants with different experience levels should be involved in the evaluation process to ensure a comprehensive assessment,Therefore, the underlying theory is that if a generative model can consistently fool a human expert, the synthetic image is likely robust enough to meet the clinical standards required for practical medical use

โจทย์ ปรนัย
What is one major ethical concern associated with generative AI in medical imaging?

While synthetic data is intended to be a privacy-preserving solution, the concern arises because if a generative model is trained on actual patient medical records, it might accidentally reproduce images that closely resemble the original data

Synthetic datasets are designed to offer a privacy preserving solution by generating realistic images that mimic the biological characteristics of real patient data without direct replication of original data. But However, if a generative model is trained on patient data and subsequently reproduce images that closely resemble the original data, it may inadvertently reveal sensitive patient information

โจทย์ ปรนัย
What regulatory precedent did the article cite for synthetic data technologies?

The source cites the FDA's clearance of synthetic MRI technologies as an emerging framework for evaluating synthetic medical imaging

So the underlying theory is that if synthetic data can be validated as functionally equivalent to real data by clinical experts (meeting the "equivalence" standard), its benefits can be realized while maintaining patient safety and diagnostic accuracy

โจทย์ ปรนัย
What is the main purpose of the article?

From my reading the goal is to refine and potentially create a "more refined regional risk score and new risk indices through collaboration" among China, Japan, and South Korea, which requires comparing and understanding their existing models

There is a recognized need for multinational approaches and collaboration among China,Japan,and Korea to develop a more refined regional risk score that standardizes the definition of ASCVD outcomes (including CHD, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease). There is also a significant knowledge gap regarding the use of these tools in East Asian Americans due to the lack of disaggregated data in U.S. clinical trials and surveys

โจทย์ ปรนัย
Why might Western-based risk prediction models overestimate ASCVD risk in East Asian populations?

because the underlying disease rates and risk factor levels differ significantly between the cohorts used to develop the models and the East Asian populations

The overestimation is partly driven by differences in the mean CHD risk and the levels of major risk factors between the cohorts. For example, men and women in the Framingham cohort had higher total cholesterol (TC) and lower HDL-C compared to the CMCS cohort

โจทย์ ปรนัย
What is the key advantage of the China-PAR model compared to Western-based models?

because the key advantage of the China-PAR (Prediction for ASCVD Risk in China) model compared to Western-based models (such as the PCE or Framingham Risk Score) is that it was developed and calibrated using data derived from native Chinese cohort studies

the model must reflect the actual, measured baseline incidence and the specific weighting of risk factors unique to the target population, rather than relying on assumed risks derived from a different,external cohort

โจทย์ ปรนัย
Which of the following variables is not typically included in ASCVD risk prediction models discussed in the article?

because ASCVD risk prediction models discussed in the article, including the U.S. Pooled Cohort Equation (PCE), China-PAR, the Suita score in Japan, and the Korean prediction models, rely on traditional, readily available clinical and demographic variables.

models sometimes incorporate other readily observable factors like geographic region (China-PAR) or BMI, genetic ancestry markers are not typically included as routine input variables in the core prediction equations for these nationally developed risk calculators.

โจทย์ ปรนัย
What is a major difference between the Suita Score and the Framingham Risk Score?

this primary difference is the origin and target population of the two models, which impacts calibration and predictive accuracy

ASCVD exhibits a specific epidemiological pattern in East Asian countries including Japan compared to Western populations.Japan, for example, historically has low CHD mortality rates but high stroke mortality rates compared with Western populations

โจทย์ ปรนัย
According to the article, what is a potential benefit of developing East Asia–specific risk models?

The key difference lies in the source of the data used for calibration and the target population for which the scores were intended

The necessity of developing regional tools like the Suita Score is dictated by the theoretical principle of Regional and Ethnic Specificity in ASCVD epidemiology.

โจทย์ ปรนัย
Which of the following models was originally developed for a Western population?

because Framingham Risk Score (FRS), and the general framework of risk assessment used in the United States, was developed based on cohort studies primarily focused on non-Hispanic White subjects and conducted in the United States

The fundamental reason that country-specific risk calculators are required, leading to the development of non-Western models like China PAR, Suita, and Korean models, is the existence of considerable differences in the epidemiological characteristics and incidence rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) subtypes across regions

โจทย์ ปรนัย
Which factor was highlighted as influencing ASCVD risk differences among East Asian countries?

because the sources emphasize that lifestyle factors, including unhealthy nutritional practices and physical inactivity, are major contributors to the development of ASCVD

The need to recognize this variation stems from the fundamental theory that ASCVD risk is highly localized,For example, South Korea had the lowest age standardized prevalence of hypertension and obesity among major East Asian countries, while Japanese people had the highest mean levels of total cholesterol (TC) and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C)

โจทย์ ปรนัย
What future direction does the article suggest for improving ASCVD risk prediction?

because sources outline several strategies for future risk prediction, emphasizing the use of advanced data integration techniques and novel biomarkers, which align with the concept of multimodal AI-based prediction integrated with regional data.

The move towards multimodal AI-based prediction integrated with regional data but however, the complex,regionally variable nature of ASCVD requires deeper insight into subclinical disease and specific physiological markers (biomarkers). Integrating this diverse information stream allows AI models to capture subtleties that single variable models miss

โจทย์ ปรนัย
Which statement best explains the key difference in how VAEs, GANs, and DDPMs generate medical images according to the figure?

Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPMs) generate medical images compared to Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs)

the DDPM's core mechanism iterative denoising through reverse diffusion is fundamentally different from the VAE's compression and reconstruction and the GAN's adversarial competition

โจทย์ ปรนัย
Which of the following best explains the trend shown in Figure comparing age-standardized and crude CVD mortality rates among East Asian countries?

statement 3 best synthesizes the comparison shown in the figure despite Japan's older demographic structure (indicated by the high crude rate relative to the ASR), its low ASR suggests effective public health measures and successful disease control compared to its regional neighbors.

This is supported by the comparison between age-standardized and crude mortality rates, which reflects the interplay between population demographics (age structure) and the actual severity of the underlying disease risk.