| 1 |
What is the primary goal of contact tracing in public health?
|
To stop the spread of diseases by identifying and informing contacts |
|
The primary goal of contact tracing is to stop the spread of disease because it identifies people who have been exposed to an infected individual and informs them so they can isolate or get tested. This breaks chains of transmission. In regions with social and economic inequalities, such as the North East of England described in the article, preventing further spread is especially important because vulnerable populations face higher risks and worse outcomes. Therefore, disease-containment is the central purpose of contact tracing.
|
The concept is supported by the Public Health principle of interrupting transmission pathways in infectious disease control. The Marmot Review and COVID-19 Marmot Review on social determinants of health show that existing inequalities worsen disease impact and make early containment strategies such as contact tracing crucial. Research on syndemics (Bambra et al., 2020) also explains how social disadvantage and disease interact, reinforcing the need to prevent spread through rapid identification of contacts.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 2 |
During the COVID-19 pandemic, what was one main reason people were motivated to isolate themselves after testing positive?
|
To avoid infecting others, particularly vulnerable populations |
|
People isolated after testing positive because they felt responsible for preventing transmission. They wanted to protect family members, friends, and vulnerable groups such as the elderly or those with chronic illnesses. Studies across multiple COVID-19 behavioral research papers show that prosocial motivation and concern for others strongly influenced self-isolation.
|
Self-isolation follows the public-health principle of source control, which aims to stop a contagious person from spreading the virus. Research on prosocial behavior also shows that empathy and social responsibility increase willingness to isolate. These concepts are supported by studies published in ScienceDirect that highlight how individuals isolated to reduce harm to their community.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 3 |
What method was commonly used for focus group discussions in the study on COVID-19 contact tracing?
|
Virtual, synchronous meetings |
|
Due to social distancing measures and restrictions on in-person gatherings during the COVID‑19 pandemic, many studies switched from traditional face-to-face focus groups to online platforms, such as video conferencing. This method allowed participants from different locations to join without traveling and provided flexibility in scheduling. Synchronous online meetings also enabled real-time interaction between participants and moderators, preserving the depth of discussion similar to in-person focus groups.
|
Online focus groups are considered an effective alternative to in-person groups during a pandemic. Synchronous meetings via videoconference allow participants to speak, listen, and interact in real time, maintaining qualitative data quality. (PMC, MDPI)
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 4 |
What factor did NOT influence the success of case investigation and contact tracing according to the article?
|
The color of the quarantine facilities |
|
Research indicates that the success of case investigation and contact tracing depends on practical and behavioral factors such as the availability of testing, public cooperation, access to reliable information, and social support. The color of quarantine facilities does not influence people’s willingness to participate, compliance, or the interruption of disease transmission. This conclusion is drawn from research reported on the ScienceDirect platform.
|
The effectiveness of contact tracing is grounded in epidemiological principles, emphasizing timely testing, accurate identification of contacts, and participant cooperation. Structural and behavioral factors are critical, whereas superficial features like building color do not affect outcomes. This is supported by findings from articles available on ScienceDirect and related public health research databases.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 5 |
Which demographic factor was reported to affect the experiences and behaviors of individuals regarding CI/CT?
|
Type of employment |
|
Research on COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing (CI/CT) shows that individuals’ experiences and behaviors were influenced by their type of employment. Those in jobs without paid sick leave or with high exposure risk faced more challenges in isolating or notifying contacts, affecting compliance and participation. Employment conditions shaped practical ability to follow CI/CT guidance, unlike irrelevant personal preferences such as favorite color or music. This finding is reported in research available on ScienceDirect.
|
The influence of employment type reflects structural and social determinants of health: socioeconomic factors, job security, and workplace flexibility directly impact public health compliance. Epidemiological models of contact tracing emphasize that compliance is critical to interrupting disease transmission, and structural barriers like job conditions can hinder effectiveness.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 6 |
What did participants report feeling after learning they were exposed to COVID-19?
|
Worry about their health and that of their contacts |
|
Studies on COVID-19 contact tracing indicate that participants commonly experienced worry or anxiety after being notified of potential exposure. This concern was not only about their own health but also about the risk of infecting family, friends, or other vulnerable contacts. Emotional responses influenced their behavior, such as adherence to isolation or seeking testing, showing that psychological factors play a role in public health compliance.
|
Psychological and behavioral science frameworks explain that perceived risk and concern for others drive compliance with health measures. Emotional responses like worry can motivate protective behaviors, including self-isolation and notifying contacts, which are essential for effective contact tracing. These findings are reported in studies on COVID-19 contact tracing available on ScienceDirect.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 7 |
What was a common source of information for participants when they learned about their COVID-19 status?
|
Family, friends, and healthcare providers |
|
Research shows that participants most often learned about their COVID-19 status through trusted interpersonal sources, such as family, friends, or healthcare providers. These sources provided accurate, timely, and personally relevant information, unlike rumors from social media or passive sources like advertisements. Reliable interpersonal communication influenced participants’ understanding, emotional response, and subsequent behaviors such as self-isolation and notifying contacts.
|
Public health communication theory emphasizes that trusted interpersonal sources are more effective than mass media or informal rumors in shaping health behaviors. Accurate information from close contacts or healthcare professionals increases adherence to public health guidance, which is essential for effective contact tracing. This finding is supported by studies on COVID-19 contact tracing on ScienceDirect.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 8 |
Which of the following was NOT a method for collecting data in the study described?
|
Direct observations in homes |
|
The study on COVID-19 contact tracing used one-on-one interviews, virtual focus groups, and survey questionnaires to collect qualitative and quantitative data. Direct observation in participants’ homes was not used, likely due to COVID-19 restrictions and concerns about safety and privacy. This ensured data collection remained ethical and feasible while minimizing risk of virus transmission.
|
Qualitative and quantitative research methods during pandemics often rely on remote or virtual data collection (interviews, focus groups, surveys) to ensure participant safety. Direct in-home observation is typically avoided when physical contact poses health risks. This approach aligns with ethical research principles and public health guidelines, as supported by COVID-19 studies on ScienceDirect.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 9 |
What ethical considerations were emphasized during the focus group discussions?
|
Ensuring privacy and voluntary participation |
|
In the study on COVID-19, ethical considerations during focus group discussions focused on protecting participants’ privacy and ensuring that participation was voluntary. This included informed consent, confidentiality of responses, and creating a safe space for participants to share their experiences without fear of judgment or repercussion. Such measures are essential to maintain trust, data integrity, and adherence to research ethics.
|
Research ethics frameworks emphasize informed consent, confidentiality, and voluntary participation as core principles, especially in studies involving sensitive health information. These principles protect participants and enhance the credibility and ethical integrity of the research. This approach was highlighted in COVID-19 focus group studies reported on ScienceDirect.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 10 |
How did the availability of self-tests in 2021 impact the public health response to COVID-19?
|
It increased the speed at which people could learn their infection status |
|
The introduction of COVID-19 self-tests allowed individuals to quickly determine whether they were infected without waiting for formal testing appointments. This faster access to results enabled timely self-isolation, notification of contacts, and early engagement with healthcare services, enhancing the effectiveness of contact tracing and reducing further transmission. Rapid self-testing thus strengthened the overall public health response.
|
Rapid self-testing aligns with epidemiological principles of early detection and isolation to control infectious disease spread. Increasing testing speed improves timeliness in identifying cases, which is critical for interrupting transmission chains. Research on COVID-19 self-testing in 2021, reported on ScienceDirect, supports this impact on public health response.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 11 |
What is urban ecology primarily concerned with?
|
The interactions between urban environments and ecosystems |
|
Urban ecology studies how urban environments — including buildings, roads, and human populations — interact with natural ecosystems. It focuses on understanding ecological processes, biodiversity, and environmental impacts within cities, as well as how urban development affects natural systems. This helps in planning sustainable urban areas that balance human needs with ecological health.
|
Urban ecology integrates ecology, environmental science, and urban studies to examine the flows of energy, materials, and organisms in cities. It emphasizes that urban areas are ecosystems themselves and that human activity significantly shapes ecological dynamics. Research in urban ecology informs sustainable city planning and environmental management.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 12 |
Which continent is noted as rapidly urbanizing within the study?
|
Africa |
|
The study highlights Africa as experiencing rapid urbanization, with city populations growing faster than in other continents. This accelerated growth poses unique ecological challenges, such as habitat loss, increased pollution, and pressure on urban green spaces. Understanding these changes is essential for urban ecology research to develop sustainable planning strategies.
|
Urbanization theory explains that rapid city growth alters ecological dynamics, including biodiversity and ecosystem services. Bibliometric and literature reviews on African urban ecology (ScienceDirect, 2023) confirm that rapid urbanization drives research focus on these ecological impacts.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 13 |
What significant bias is present in the study of urban ecology in Africa?
|
Focus on wealthy nations |
|
The study found that much of urban ecology research historically focuses on wealthy nations, leaving African cities underrepresented. This bias limits understanding of urban ecological dynamics in African contexts and results in fewer locally relevant solutions. For example, many studies are centered on South Africa or Nigeria, while smaller or less wealthy countries receive little attention.
|
Research bias theory explains that funding, infrastructure, and historical focus favor wealthy nations, affecting the distribution of studies. Bibliometric analyses of African urban ecology (ScienceDirect, 2023) confirm this geographic and economic bias.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 14 |
What factor did the study NOT find influencing research efforts in African urban ecology?
|
Technological advancements |
|
While GDP, urbanization intensity, ecoregion conservation status, and geographic distribution shaped research effort, technological advancements did not significantly influence the number or focus of studies. Many studies rely on existing literature and bibliometric methods rather than new technological tools.
|
Research capacity theory suggests that economic and ecological factors matter more than technology in directing research focus in low-resource regions. Bibliometric reviews (ScienceDirect, 2023) support this finding.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 15 |
Which method was used to gather data for the study?
|
Literature review and bibliographic searches |
|
The study gathered data by reviewing published urban ecology research and bibliographic databases to identify patterns, biases, and gaps in African cities. No direct experimental or fieldwork data collection was performed, making this approach safe and comprehensive during pandemic constraints.
|
Systematic review methodology allows comprehensive assessment of research trends and biases without new fieldwork (ScienceDirect, 2023).
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 16 |
What does the study suggest is needed for urban ecology research in Africa?
|
A realignment of research priorities |
|
The study recommends refocusing research priorities to cover underrepresented regions, African-specific ecological challenges, and balancing field and theoretical approaches for a comprehensive understanding.
|
Priority-setting frameworks in ecology emphasize aligning research with local challenges and knowledge gaps (ScienceDirect, 2023).
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 17 |
Which country was mentioned as having the majority of the studies?
|
South Africa |
|
Most studies were conducted in South Africa due to higher research infrastructure, funding availability, and the concentration of universities conducting ecological research.
|
Research capacity theory suggests countries with better infrastructure and funding produce more studies (ScienceDirect, 2023).
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 18 |
How did the study categorize the geographic biases in research?
|
Unevenly distributed |
|
Research efforts are concentrated in a few countries and major cities, leaving many regions poorly represented. This limits generalizability and understanding of urban ecology across Africa.
|
Geographical bias theory highlights that research is often concentrated where resources and institutions are strongest (ScienceDirect, 2023).
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 19 |
What is a key recommendation from the study for improving urban ecology research in Africa?
|
Encourage transnational collaborations |
|
Collaboration across countries allows sharing of data, resources, and expertise, and improves coverage of underrepresented regions, reducing geographic and knowledge gaps.
|
Collaboration theory supports that cross-border partnerships improve research quality and coverage (ScienceDirect, 2023).
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 20 |
According to the study, what impacts the number of publications in African urban ecology?
|
The GDP of the countries |
|
Countries with higher GDP have more universities, research funding, and infrastructure, enabling more studies and publications.
|
Economic and research capacity theory indicates that wealthier countries can produce more scientific output (ScienceDirect, 2023).
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|