1 |
What is the primary goal of contact tracing in public health?
|
To stop the spread of diseases by identifying and informing contacts |
|
The primary goal of contact tracing in public health is to identify people who have been in contact with an infected person, inform them of their potential exposure, and recommend actions such as testing, quarantine, or monitoring for symptoms. This helps break the chain of transmission and prevent further spread of infectious diseases.
|
The World Health Organization (WHO) states that
"Contact tracing is essential for breaking the chains of transmission of infectious diseases and controlling outbreaks."
Similarly, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recognizes contact tracing as a core strategy for slowing the spread of infectious diseases. The CDC also highlights research showing that rigorous and timely implementation of contact tracing can significantly reduce the number of new infections.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
2 |
During the COVID-19 pandemic, what was one main reason people were motivated to isolate themselves after testing positive?
|
To avoid infecting others, particularly vulnerable populations |
|
The main reason people isolated themselves after testing positive for COVID-19 was to avoid infecting others, especially those at high risk such as the elderly, people with chronic illnesses, or weakened immune systems.
This behavior reflects social responsibility and is supported by public health guidelines from the WHO and CDC, which emphasized protecting vulnerable populations as a key goal during the pandemic.
|
Self-isolation after testing positive for COVID-19 is supported by public health theories like primary prevention and the SIR disease transmission model, which aim to reduce the spread of infection. Ethical principles, such as non-maleficence, also encourage isolation to protect others, especially vulnerable groups. Research by Ferguson et al. (2020) and Chu et al. (2020) confirms that timely isolation can significantly lower transmission and save lives. Organizations like WHO and CDC recognize isolation as a key strategy in controlling infectious diseases.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
3 |
What method was commonly used for focus group discussions in the study on COVID-19 contact tracing?
|
Virtual, synchronous meetings |
|
Because virtual and synchronous meetings (such as Zoom or Microsoft Teams) for small group discussions maintain social distancing and reduce the risk of infection, while allowing participants to interact in real time.
|
Studies during the pandemic (e.g., Lobe et al., 2020) showed that virtual focus groups maintained data quality and participant interaction, while ensuring safety and convenience.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
4 |
What factor did NOT influence the success of case investigation and contact tracing according to the article?
|
The color of the quarantine facilities |
|
While testing availability, public cooperation, access to information, and sometimes even political ideology can influence the effectiveness of case investigation and contact tracing, the color of quarantine facilities is irrelevant and has no impact on the success of these efforts.
|
The answer was derived using deductive reasoning and guided by evidence-based public health principles. Factors like testing, cooperation, and information access are consistently supported by research, whereas the color of quarantine facilities lacks logical or empirical relevance—making it the correct answer.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
5 |
Which demographic factor was reported to affect the experiences and behaviors of individuals regarding CI/CT?
|
Type of employment |
|
Type of employment significantly affects individuals' experiences and behaviors in case investigation (CI) and contact tracing (CT).
-On-site workers (e.g., factory or service workers) are at higher risk of exposure and may be more concerned about transmission.
-Remote workers may find it easier to comply with isolation or cooperate with public health officials.
-Hourly or temporary workers may fear income loss, making them less willing to share contact information or isolate.
Thus, employment status influences trust, cooperation, and practical ability to participate in CI/CT efforts.
|
Katz et al. (2020), American Journal of Public Health
- Essential workers were more exposed to COVID-19 but had less access to paid leave and isolation support—affecting their willingness to engage in contact tracing.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
6 |
What did participants report feeling after learning they were exposed to COVID-19?
|
Worry about their health and that of their contacts |
|
Participants who learned they had been exposed to COVID-19 commonly reported feelings of worry and anxiety, especially concerning:
-Their own health
-The risk of infecting loved ones, coworkers, or vulnerable individuals
-This emotional response is logical given the potential severity of COVID-19, the uncertainty of transmission, and social responsibility. These concerns were consistently reported in surveys and qualitative studies during the pandemic.
|
•CDC Behavioral Surveys (2020)
Reported that individuals who were notified of COVID-19 exposure felt concerned, anxious, or guilty, especially when thinking about family members or colleagues they might have exposed.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
7 |
What was a common source of information for participants when they learned about their COVID-19 status?
|
Family, friends, and healthcare providers |
|
When participants learned about their COVID-19 status, many reported receiving or confirming the information through trusted sources such as:
Healthcare providers (e.g., hospitals, clinics, testing sites)
Family and friends who were also exposed or infected
These sources were considered credible and emotionally supportive, especially compared to misinformation on social media or impersonal sources like TV commercials.
|
•Czeisler et al. (2020), CDC MMWR
Found that participants relied heavily on healthcare professionals and close social circles for accurate COVID-19 information, especially after receiving positive test results.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
8 |
Which of the following was NOT a method for collecting data in the study described?
|
Direct observations in homes |
|
The study described used methods like:
One-on-one interviews
Virtual focus groups
Survey questionnaires
These are all remote or low-risk methods, appropriate during the COVID-19 pandemic when minimizing physical contact was essential.
In contrast, direct observations in homes would involve entering personal spaces, increasing the risk of viral transmission and raising ethical and privacy concerns, making it highly unlikely as a data collection method during such a time.
|
•Principle of Minimizing Risk (Research Ethics – Belmont Report, 1979)
Ethical research must protect participants from unnecessary harm or risk.
During a pandemic, in-person home visits are considered high-risk unless absolutely necessary.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
9 |
What ethical considerations were emphasized during the focus group discussions?
|
Ensuring privacy and voluntary participation |
|
During focus group discussions—especially those involving sensitive health topics like COVID-19—ethical standards prioritize:
Voluntary participation: Participants must freely choose to join without coercion.
Privacy and confidentiality: Personal data and shared opinions must be protected and not disclosed without permission.
These considerations are critical to ensure trust, safety, and respect for autonomy in research.
Other options like maximizing profit or promoting political/pharmaceutical agendas are unethical and violate core principles of human subjects research.
|
•WHO Ethical Guidelines for COVID-19 Research (2020)
Emphasize the importance of protecting participant privacy, ensuring autonomy, and avoiding misuse of data for commercial or political gain during public health research.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
10 |
How did the availability of self-tests in 2021 impact the public health response to COVID-19?
|
It increased the speed at which people could learn their infection status |
|
The availability of self-tests (such as rapid antigen tests) in 2021 significantly improved the speed at which individuals could determine if they were infected with COVID-19. This had several positive effects:
Faster detection = faster isolation = reduced transmission
Decentralized testing = less burden on clinics/labs
Empowered individuals to take responsibility for their health decisions
Rather than reducing accuracy or trust, self-tests complemented PCR testing and played a critical role in community-level public health response.
|
•Larremore et al. (2021), Science Advances
Found that test frequency and speed of results were more important than test sensitivity in controlling COVID-19 spread.
“A less sensitive test that returns results quickly can be more effective than a highly sensitive test with delays.”
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
11 |
What is urban ecology primarily concerned with?
|
The interactions between urban environments and ecosystems |
|
Urban ecology is a subfield of ecology that examines the relationships between living organisms and their environment within urban areas. It looks at:
How natural ecosystems function within cities
How human activities impact biodiversity, air/water quality, climate, etc.
How urban planning can integrate green spaces, sustainable systems, and ecosystem services
It is not just about buildings or economy, but rather about how nature and human systems interact in urban settings.
|
•Foundational Definition – Pickett et al. (2001)
Urban ecology studies “the structure, function, and change of ecosystems in urban areas,” focusing on biophysical processes and human-nature interactions.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
12 |
Which continent is noted as rapidly urbanizing within the study?
|
Africa |
|
Africa is widely recognized in recent studies and United Nations reports as the most rapidly urbanizing continent in the world. This urban growth is driven by:
High population growth rates
Rural-to-urban migration
Expanding informal settlements and mega-cities
|
•United Nations – World Urbanization Prospects (2018, 2022)
The UN reports that Africa will account for over half of global urban growth between now and 2050.
Urban populations in sub-Saharan Africa are expected to double in the next 25 years.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
13 |
What significant bias is present in the study of urban ecology in Africa?
|
Limited to capital cities |
|
A significant bias in urban ecology research in Africa is that studies are often concentrated in capital cities (e.g., Nairobi, Accra, Lagos), while secondary and rapidly growing urban areas receive little to no attention.
This creates an incomplete understanding of urban ecological dynamics across the continent, because:
Many non-capital cities are urbanizing even faster
These cities face unique ecological and infrastructural challenges
Overemphasis on capitals may not reflect the diversity of urban experiences in Africa
|
•UN-Habitat (2020) & African Urban Research Reports
> Highlight that urban research is disproportionately centered on major or capital cities, neglecting smaller cities where much of Africa’s urban growth is happening.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
14 |
What factor did the study NOT find influencing research efforts in African urban ecology?
|
Technological advancements |
|
The study did not find technological advancements to be a significant influencing factor in determining where or how urban ecology research was conducted in Africa.
Instead, the study emphasized that research efforts were influenced by:
GDP of countries – Wealthier nations often have more funding and research institutions
Urbanization intensity – Areas with rapid urban growth attracted more ecological research
Ecoregion conservation status – Regions with high ecological value or threatened ecosystems were prioritized
Geographic distribution – Most research was clustered in a few regions, especially capital cities
Technological advancements, although important in research methods generally, did not show a direct impact on the spatial or thematic focus of African urban ecology studies in the reviewed literature.
|
•Literature Review – Parnell & Pieterse (2014), UN-Habitat Reports
> These sources stress how economic factors, urban growth rates, and ecological priorities shape research patterns, while technology access is rarely the limiting factor in determining study locations.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
15 |
Which method was used to gather data for the study?
|
Literature review and bibliographic searches |
|
The study did not collect primary data through direct observation, experiments, surveys, or interviews.
Instead, it used secondary research methods, specifically:
Literature reviews – analyzing existing academic and gray literature
Bibliographic searches – scanning databases for published studies relevant to urban ecology in Africa
This method allowed researchers to map trends, identify research gaps, and analyze geographic and thematic biases in existing urban ecology research.
|
Tranfield et al. (2003), British Journal of Management
> Literature reviews are essential for understanding research landscapes, especially in underrepresented fields or regions.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
16 |
What does the study suggest is needed for urban ecology research in Africa?
|
A realignment of research priorities |
|
The study emphasizes that urban ecology research in Africa often reflects external (non-African) priorities or focuses disproportionately on capital cities and well-funded regions, leaving many critical urban ecological challenges underexplored.
Therefore, it calls for a realignment of research priorities to:
Better reflect local urban issues (e.g. informal settlements, local biodiversity, climate adaptation)
Include understudied cities and ecoregions
Address community-specific needs rather than replicating Global North research agendas
This means prioritizing African voices, contexts, and ecological realities in both research questions and methodologies.
|
Parnell & Pieterse (2014), Africa’s Urban Revolution
> Call for “a fundamental rethinking of urban research” in Africa to address localized ecological and social realities.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
17 |
Which country was mentioned as having the majority of the studies?
|
South Africa |
|
The study identified South Africa as the country with the largest number of published urban ecology studies in Africa. This dominance is attributed to several factors:
Higher GDP and stronger research infrastructure compared to many other African nations
A well-established network of universities and ecological research institutes
Early and sustained international collaborations in environmental science
Significant urban areas like Cape Town, Johannesburg, and Durban that attract academic attention
This research concentration creates a geographic imbalance, where countries like South Africa are overrepresented, while many rapidly urbanizing nations remain understudied.
|
Parnell & Pieterse (2014), Africa’s Urban Revolution
> South Africa’s urban research is extensive due to its historical academic capacity, access to funding, and long-standing policy-research linkages.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
18 |
How did the study categorize the geographic biases in research?
|
Unevenly distributed |
|
The study found that urban ecology research in Africa is not evenly spread across countries or regions. Instead, it is concentrated in a few countries (like South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria), while many other rapidly urbanizing nations are underrepresented.
|
UN-Habitat Reports (2020–2022)
> Emphasize the need to address regional research gaps and avoid overconcentration in academic hubs.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
19 |
What is a key recommendation from the study for improving urban ecology research in Africa?
|
Encourage transnational collaborations |
|
The study recommends promoting collaborations across countries and institutions to:
Share knowledge, resources, and expertise
Address the geographic and thematic gaps in African urban ecology research
Support capacity building in underrepresented regions
Foster multi-disciplinary approaches that are needed for complex urban ecological challenges
Transnational collaboration helps overcome resource constraints and enhances the overall quality and relevance of research.
|
Parnell & Pieterse (2014), Africa’s Urban Revolution
> Stress the importance of international partnerships to build robust urban research networks.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
20 |
According to the study, what impacts the number of publications in African urban ecology?
|
The GDP of the countries |
|
The study found that the economic strength of a country, often measured by GDP (Gross Domestic Product), strongly correlates with the number of urban ecology publications. Countries with higher GDP tend to:
Have better funding for research and universities
Support more research infrastructure and personnel
Facilitate international collaborations
Provide access to resources, technology, and data
While the number of universities, political stability, and personal interests of researchers may influence research, GDP is a key systemic factor driving research output.
|
UNESCO Science Report (2015)
> Highlights GDP as a major driver of research capacity globally.
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|