| 1 |
What is the primary goal of contact tracing in public health?
|
To stop the spread of diseases by identifying and informing contacts |
|
To control the diseases and notifying close contacts of their potential exposure
|
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health - Experiences with COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing: A
qualitative analysis
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 2 |
During the COVID-19 pandemic, what was one main reason people were motivated to isolate themselves after testing positive?
|
To avoid infecting others, particularly vulnerable populations |
|
Some cases expressed concerns with the uncertainty of the disease
and their health outcome or Impact on surrounding people.
|
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health - Experiences with COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing: A
qualitative analysis
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 3 |
What method was commonly used for focus group discussions in the study on COVID-19 contact tracing?
|
Asynchronous online forums |
|
Focus group guides were developed and pretested prior to data
collection.
|
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health - Experiences with COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing: A
qualitative analysis
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 4 |
What factor did NOT influence the success of case investigation and contact tracing according to the article?
|
The color of the quarantine facilities |
|
The color of a facility has no meaningful impact on whether public health efforts succeed.
|
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health - Experiences with COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing: A
qualitative analysis
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 5 |
Which demographic factor was reported to affect the experiences and behaviors of individuals regarding CI/CT?
|
Type of employment |
|
Both of them are viewing someone who has the close contacts. Essential or frontline workers may be at higher risk of exposure.
|
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health - Experiences with COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing: A
qualitative analysis
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 6 |
What did participants report feeling after learning they were exposed to COVID-19?
|
Worry about their health and that of their contacts |
|
Cases noted
that they were most concerned about overall community health and
getting others sick.
|
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health - Experiences with COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing: A
qualitative analysis
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 7 |
What was a common source of information for participants when they learned about their COVID-19 status?
|
Family, friends, and healthcare providers |
|
Most contacts were noti ed of COVID-19 exposure by a family
member.
|
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health - Experiences with COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing: A
qualitative analysis
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 8 |
Which of the following was NOT a method for collecting data in the study described?
|
Direct observations in homes |
|
Because it’s not mentioned.
|
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health - Experiences with COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing: A
qualitative analysis
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 9 |
What ethical considerations were emphasized during the focus group discussions?
|
Ensuring privacy and voluntary participation |
|
The research was reviewed at the
start of each group, and consent was obtained from each participant.
|
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health - Experiences with COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing: A
qualitative analysis
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 10 |
How did the availability of self-tests in 2021 impact the public health response to COVID-19?
|
It increased the speed at which people could learn their infection status |
|
To take responsibility for their own health decisions.
|
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health - Experiences with COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing: A
qualitative analysis
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 11 |
What is urban ecology primarily concerned with?
|
The interactions between urban environments and ecosystems |
|
How urbanization affects biodiversity, air, water, and soil quality
|
Landscape and Urban Planning - Status of urban ecology in Africa: A systematic review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 12 |
Which continent is noted as rapidly urbanizing within the study?
|
Africa |
|
They conducted a systematic literature review to
determine trends in urban ecological research conducted in Africa.
|
Landscape and Urban Planning - Status of urban ecology in Africa: A systematic review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 13 |
What significant bias is present in the study of urban ecology in Africa?
|
Limited to capital cities |
|
They tested whether the number of publications.
|
Landscape and Urban Planning - Status of urban ecology in Africa: A systematic review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 14 |
What factor did the study NOT find influencing research efforts in African urban ecology?
|
Technological advancements |
|
technological advancements were not identified.
|
Landscape and Urban Planning - Status of urban ecology in Africa: A systematic review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 15 |
Which method was used to gather data for the study?
|
All of the above |
|
They performed a literature search in Web of Science and Google Scholar.
|
Landscape and Urban Planning - Status of urban ecology in Africa: A systematic review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 16 |
What does the study suggest is needed for urban ecology research in Africa?
|
A realignment of research priorities |
|
Focus on underrepresented regions and urban biodiversity.
|
Landscape and Urban Planning - Status of urban ecology in Africa: A systematic review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 17 |
Which country was mentioned as having the majority of the studies?
|
South Africa |
|
A single country South Africa published 4 out of every 10 papers on the topic with the highly-urbanized and biodiversity-rich countries.
|
Landscape and Urban Planning - Status of urban ecology in Africa: A systematic review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 18 |
How did the study categorize the geographic biases in research?
|
Unevenly distributed |
|
Contrary to their expectation, countries
with higher human density and current or future urbanization prospects have not been more studied.
|
Landscape and Urban Planning - Status of urban ecology in Africa: A systematic review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 19 |
What is a key recommendation from the study for improving urban ecology research in Africa?
|
Encourage transnational collaborations |
|
Promote diverse and context-relevant approaches to urban ecology.
|
Landscape and Urban Planning - Status of urban ecology in Africa: A systematic review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 20 |
According to the study, what impacts the number of publications in African urban ecology?
|
The number of rural areas |
|
From fig 4. The distribution of urban ecological study sites superimposed on urbanization intensity.
|
Landscape and Urban Planning - Status of urban ecology in Africa: A systematic review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|