| 1 |
What is the primary focus of the paper?
|
Case investigation and contact tracing for COVID-19 |
|
Case investigation involves interviewing someone who has confirmed or suspected COVID-19 to learn whom they may have exposed to the virus, eliciting their contacts, counseling them to monitor their symptoms, and recommending isolation .
|
Experiences with COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing: A qualitative analysis
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 2 |
What is the purpose of case investigation in the context of COVID-19?
|
Identifying contacts of confirmed or suspected cases |
|
to learn whom they may have exposed to the virus, eliciting their contacts, counseling them to monitor their symptoms, and recommending isolation.
|
Experiences with COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 3 |
What is contact tracing, as defined in the paper?
|
Notifying close contacts of potential exposure |
|
As to manning workforce requirements for contact tracking depends on several factors, including the estimated number of contacts to be traced, physical and technology call logistics of reaching affected, comedies and contacts contacts social political contact concerns and contact tracking modalities, such as self report versus in person daily visits public health requirements and plan for an adapt size Workforce of contact tracers
|
Contact tracing in the contacts of COVID-19
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 4 |
Why did health departments face challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic?
|
Overwhelming testing availability |
|
Part of recovering from the pandemic requires restructuring public health care systems to be better prepared to manage novel disease outbreaks that overwhelmed the traditional hospital system and significantly impaired patient care quality and capacity.
|
Global Challenges to Public Health Care Systems during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of Pandemic Measures and Problems
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 5 |
Essay | Examine the variations in individuals' experiences with CI/CT for COVID-19 based on demographic characteristics. How do factors such as age, race, ethnicity, income, and political ideology influence these experiences?
|
we explore the experiences and behaviors of adults with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results. |
|
we explore the experiences and behaviors of adults with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results, or who were exposed to a person with COVID-19, to understand their knowledge, motivations, and facilitators and barriers to their actions
|
Experiences with COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing
|
10 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 6 |
What is the primary concern raised by the authors regarding the state of knowledge in African urban ecology?
|
Geographic and ecological mismatches in research effort |
|
Thus, we did a detailed literature search to determine the state of knowledge in African urban ecology in the last century. We found 795 relevant papers from where data were collected and tested to understand geographic and ecological mismatches in research effort.
|
Status of urban ecology in Africa: A systematic review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 7 |
What significant predictors did the study investigate regarding the number of publications on African urban ecology?
|
Conservation status and size of ecoregions |
|
size and conservation status of ecoregions significantly predicted the number of publications, suggesting that research effort is driven by economic reasons and the relevance of conservation in African urban ecology.
|
Status of urban ecology in Africa: A systematic review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 8 |
In terms of research scale, where were the majority of the studies conducted according to the study?
|
Local level |
|
Studies were conducted in 72% of African countries, with South Africa alone accounting for almost 40% of all published papers. The studies were either conducted at the city (55%) or local/country (34%) level, suggesting the lack of transnational research collaboration.
|
Status of urban ecology in Africa: A systematic review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 9 |
What methodological approach did the authors use to conduct the literature search in this study?
|
Systematic literature review |
|
Since traditional approaches to literature reviews are prone to errors (Grant & Booth, 2009), rigorous methodological approaches have been developed and applied more recently in the field of urban ecology.
|
Status of urban ecology in Africa: A systematic review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 10 |
Essay | Examine the key factors contributing to the lack of knowledge and research gaps in African urban ecology, as highlighted in the literature review. Discuss the potential implications of this knowledge gap and propose strategies to address and advance research in this field.
|
It will be argued that the potential for making theoretical and practical contributions using the literature review. |
|
In the following paper, it will be argued that the potential for making theoretical and practical contributions using the literature review as a method will be advanced by clarifying what a literature review is, how it can be used, and what criteria should be used to evaluate its quality.
|
Status of urban ecology in Africa: A systematic review
|
10 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 11 |
According to the literature search, what are the four key formulations through which acceptability has been defined or conceptualized?
|
User affective attitude, behavioral intention, actual system usage behavior, satisfaction following system usage |
|
The literature has converged towards three overarching categories of factors underpinning AI acceptability including: user factors involving trust, system understanding, AI literacy, and technology receptiveness; system usage factors entailing value proposition, self-efficacy, burden, and workflow integration.
|
Understanding the factors influencing acceptability of AI in medical imaging domains among healthcare professionals: A scoping review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 12 |
Which academic databases were included in the search strategy for the scoping review on the acceptability of AI in medical imaging domains?
|
PubMed, IEEE Xplore, JSTOR, PsycINFO |
|
-
|
Understanding the factors influencing acceptability of AI in medical imaging domains among healthcare professionals: A scoping review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 13 |
What were the criteria for inclusion and exclusion of publications in the scoping review?
|
Studies had to be retrospective in design, and those about AI integration into clinical education were excluded. |
|
-
|
Understanding the factors influencing acceptability of AI in medical imaging domains among healthcare professionals: A scoping review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 14 |
How many studies were included in the scoping review, and which aspect of AI acceptability did the majority of these studies focus on?
|
42 studies; concrete AI systems |
|
-
|
Understanding the factors influencing acceptability of AI in medical imaging domains among healthcare professionals: A scoping review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 15 |
Essay | Explain the concept of acceptability in the context of AI in medical imaging. Outline the key dimensions through which acceptability has been conceptualized in past studies and why a scoping review considered multiple formulations. Additionally, discuss the importance of considering end-user perspectives in the evaluation of AI acceptability.
|
This was done in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. |
|
A systematic literature search was performed across five academic databases including Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Compendex, and Scopus from January 2013 to September 2023. This was done in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Overall, 31 articles were deemed appropriate for inclusion in the scoping review.
|
Understanding the factors influencing acceptability of AI in medical imaging domains among healthcare professionals: A scoping review
|
10 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 16 |
What is workplace violence (WPV) in healthcare?
|
Only physical assault by patients |
|
-
|
Workplace violence in medical radiation science: A systematic review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 17 |
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), what is the impact of WPV on healthcare workers?
|
Positive impact on job performance |
|
-
|
Workplace violence in medical radiation science: A systematic review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 18 |
Why is there a need for a systematic review on WPV in medical radiation science (MRS)?
|
Lack of understanding about WPV prevalence and risk factors in MRS |
|
-
|
Workplace violence in medical radiation science: A systematic review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 19 |
What databases were used for the literature search in the systematic review on WPV in MRS?
|
Only non-scholarly sources |
|
-
|
Workplace violence in medical radiation science: A systematic review
|
7 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|
| 20 |
Essay | Workplace Violence (WPV) in Healthcare. Please explain the impacts and research gaps.
|
as many as 32% of employees will develop post-traumatic stress disorder or other traumatic disorders after an incident. |
|
Psychological and Emotional Impact
Studies have shown that as many as 32% of employees will develop post-traumatic stress disorder or other traumatic disorders after an incident.
|
Workplace violence in medical radiation science: A systematic review
|
10 |
-.50
-.25
+.25
เต็ม
0
-35%
+30%
+35%
|